ReviewNeurologia medico-chirurgica2017
Pediatric Craniovertebral Junction Surgery.
Review in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Endoscopic lipofilling for velopharyngeal insufficiency after transoral surgery: a technical note.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Surgical Management of Chiari 1.5 in Children: A Truly Different Disease?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Dural arteriovenous fistula of the lateral foramen magnum region: A review.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2018Review
- Anomalous Craniovertebral Junction (CVJ) Anomalies in Pediatric Population: Impact of Digital Three-dimensional Animated Models in Enhancing the Surgical Decision-making.Journal of pediatric neurosciencesArticle
- Does Socioeconomic Status Have an Association with Cranio-vertebral Anomalies: A Step Toward Healing the Curse!Journal of pediatric neurosciencesArticle
- Craniovertebral junction instability in Larsen syndrome: An institutional series and review of literature.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The craniovertebral junction (CVJ) has attracted more attention in pediatric medicine in recent years due to the progress in surgical technologies allowing a direct approach to the CVJ in children. The CVJ is the site of numerous pathologies, most originating in bone anomalies resulting from abnormal CVJ development. Before discussing the surgical approaches to CVJ, three points should be borne in mind: first, that developmental anatomy demonstrates age-dependent mechanisms and the pathophysiology of pediatric CVJ anomalies; second, that CT-based dynamic simulations have improved our knowledge of functional anatomy, enabling us to locate CVJ lesions with greater certainty; and third, understanding the complex structure of the pediatric CVJ also clarifies the surgical anatomy. This review begins with a description of the embryonic developmental process of the CVJ, comprising ossification and resegmentation of the somite. From the clinical perspective, pediatric CVJ lesions can be divided into three categories: developmental bony anomalies with or without instability, stenotic CVJ lesions, and others. After discussing surgery and management based on this classification, the author describes surgical outcomes on his hands, and finally proceeds to address controversial issues specific for pediatric CVJ surgery. The lessons, which the author has gleaned from his experience in pediatric CVJ surgery, are also presented briefly in this review. Recent technological progress has facilitated pediatric surgery of the CVJ. However, it is important to recognize that we are still far from reliably and consistently obtaining satisfactory results. Further progress in this area awaits contributions of the coming generations of pediatric surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.