Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28768613›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2017

Medicine Goes Female: Protocol for Improving Career Options of Females and Working Conditions for Researching Physicians in Clinical Medical Research by Organizational Transformation and Participatory Design.

Joachim Hasebrook, Klaus Hahnenkamp, Wolfgang F F A Buhre, Dianne de Korte-de Boer, Ankie E W Hamaekers, Bibiana Metelmann, Camila Metelmann, Marina Bortul, Silvia Palmisano, Jannicke Mellin-Olsen and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Joachim Hasebrookzeb.business school, Steinbeis University Berlin, Muenster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9706-4267
Klaus HahnenkampClinic for Anesthesiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2905-0362
Wolfgang F F A BuhreDepartment of Anaesthesia & Pain therapy, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8296-9426
Dianne de Korte-de BoerDepartment of Anaesthesia & Pain therapy, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4688-8300
Ankie E W HamaekersDepartment of Anaesthesia & Pain therapy, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0913-4788
Bibiana MetelmannClinic for Anesthesiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2090-7358
Camila MetelmannClinic for Anesthesiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6145-9021
Marina BortulGeneral Surgery Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5107-9607
Silvia PalmisanoGeneral Surgery Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4749-4258
Jannicke Mellin-OlsenBærum Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Vestre Viken Health Trust, Vestre Viken, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3466-2286
Andrius MacasDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4048-3065
Janusz AndresUniversity Hospital, Clinic for Anasethesiology, Uniwersytet Jagiellonski, Cracow, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8804-0290
Anna Prokop-DornerChair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Medical Sociology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3575-469X
Tomáš VymazalClinic for Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Praha, Praha, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1618-6252
Juergen HinkelmannBoard of the University Hospital Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1163-9841
Sibyll Roddezeb.health care, zeb, Muenster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2683-8971
Bettina PfleidererDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Chair of the Research Group Cognition & Gender, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1238-6225
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEJagiellonian University · PLUniversity of Trieste · ITGoethe University Frankfurt · DELithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTSteinbeis University Berlin · DEVestre Viken Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAll European countries need to increase the number of health professionals in the near future. Most efforts have not brought the expected results so far. The current notion is that this is mainly related to the fact that female physicians will clearly outnumber their male colleagues within a few years in nearly all European countries. Still, women are underrepresented in leadership and research positions throughout Europe.

objectivesThe MedGoFem project addresses multiple perspectives with the participation of multiple stakeholders. The goal is to facilitate the implementation of Gender Equality Plans (GEP) in university hospitals; thereby, transforming the working conditions for women working as researchers and highly qualified physicians simultaneously. Our proposed innovation, a crosscutting topic in all research and clinical activities, must become an essential part of university hospital strategic concepts.

methodsWe capture the current status with gender-sensitive demographic data concerning medical staff and conduct Web-based surveys to identify cultural, country-specific, and interdisciplinary factors conducive to women's academic success. Individual expectations of employees regarding job satisfaction and working conditions will be visualized based on "personal construct theory" through repertory grids. An expert board working out scenarios and a gender topic agenda will identify culture-, nation-, and discipline-specific aspects of gender equality. University hospitals in 7 countries will establish consensus groups, which work on related topics. Hospital management supports the consensus groups, valuates group results, and shares discussion results and suggested measures across groups. Central findings of the consensus groups will be prepared as exemplary case studies for academic teaching on research and work organization, leadership, and management.

resultsA discussion group on gender equality in academic medicine will be established on an internationally renowned open-research platform. Project results will be published in peer-reviewed journals with high-impact factors. In addition, workshops on gender dimension in research using the principles of Gendered Innovation will be held. Support and consulting services for hospitals will be introduced in order to develop a European consulting service.

conclusionsThe main impact of the project will be the implementation of innovative GEP tailored to the needs of university hospitals, which will lead to measurable institutional change in gender equality. This will impact the research at university hospitals in general, and will improve career prospects of female researchers in particular. Simultaneously, the gender dimension in medical research as an innovation factor and mandatory topic will be strengthened and integrated in each individual university hospital research activity. Research funding organizations can use the built knowledge to include mandatory topics for funding applications to enforce the use and implementation of GEP in university hospitals.

Indexed as

gender equalitygender equality planresearch in academic medicineskills shortageworking conditions

Identifiers

PMID28768613
PMCPMC5559648
OpenAlexW2740558201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.