Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28768539›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2017

Comprehensive in silico allergenicity assessment of novel protein engineered chimeric Cry proteins for safe deployment in crops.

Maniraj Rathinam, Shweta Singh, Debasis Pattanayak, Rohini Sreevathsa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maniraj RathinamICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, LBS Centre, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Shweta SinghICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, LBS Centre, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Debasis PattanayakICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, LBS Centre, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Rohini SreevathsaICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, LBS Centre, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, 110012, India. rohinisreevathsa@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4171-6956

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDevelopment of chimeric Cry toxins by protein engineering of known and validated proteins is imperative for enhancing the efficacy and broadening the insecticidal spectrum of these genes. Expression of novel Cry proteins in food crops has however created apprehensions with respect to the safety aspects. To clarify this, premarket evaluation consisting of an array of analyses to evaluate the unintended effects is a prerequisite to provide safety assurance to the consumers. Additionally, series of bioinformatic tools as in silico aids are being used to evaluate the likely allergenic reaction of the proteins based on sequence and epitope similarity with known allergens.

resultsIn the present study, chimeric Cry toxins developed through protein engineering were evaluated for allergenic potential using various in silico algorithms. Major emphasis was on the validation of allergenic potential on three aspects of paramount significance viz., sequence-based homology between allergenic proteins, validation of conformational epitopes towards identification of food allergens and physico-chemical properties of amino acids. Additionally, in vitro analysis pertaining to heat stability of two of the eight chimeric proteins and pepsin digestibility further demonstrated the non-allergenic potential of these chimeric toxins.

conclusionsThe study revealed for the first time an all-encompassing evaluation that the recombinant Cry proteins did not show any potential similarity with any known allergens with respect to the parameters generally considered for a protein to be designated as an allergen. These novel chimeric proteins hence can be considered safe to be introgressed into plants.

Indexed as

AllergensBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsBacterial ProteinsCrops, AgriculturalDatabases, ProteinEndotoxinsFood HypersensitivityHemolysin ProteinsPepsin APlants, Genetically ModifiedProtein EngineeringProtein StabilityRecombinant ProteinsAllergensBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsBacterial ProteinsEndotoxinsHemolysin Proteinsinsecticidal crystal protein, Bacillus ThuringiensisPepsin ARecombinant ProteinsAllergenicityBacillus thuringiensisCry proteinsFood cropsInsect resistanceTransgenics

Identifiers

PMID28768539
PMCPMC5541426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.