Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28768492›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2017

The effect of youth assertive community treatment: a systematic PRISMA review.

Richard Vijverberg, Robert Ferdinand, Aartjan Beekman, Berno van Meijel

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An Assertive Community Intervention to Engage Youth with Opioid Use Disorder and Their Families.Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Factors affecting readmission of adolescent mental healthcare users to a psychiatric hospital.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Clinical significance of assertive community treatment among adolescents.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Richard VijverbergDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, GGZ-Delfland, PO-box 5016, 2600, GA, Delft, The Netherlands. r.vijverberg@ggz-delfland.nl.
Robert FerdinandDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, GGZ-Delfland, PO-box 5016, 2600, GA, Delft, The Netherlands.
Aartjan BeekmanVU Medical Centre/GGZ-InGeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Berno van MeijelDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
GGZ Delfland · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLParnassia Groep · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the past decades deinstitutionalisation policies have led to a transition from inpatient towards community mental health care. Many European countries implement Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) as an alternative for inpatient care for "difficult to reach" children and adolescents with severe mental illness. ACT is a well-organized low-threshold treatment modality; patients are actively approached in their own environment, and efforts are undertaken to strengthen the patient's motivation for treatment. The assumption is that ACT may help to avoid psychiatric hospital admissions, enhance cost-effectiveness, stimulate social participation and support, and reduce stigma. ACT has been extensively investigated in adults with severe mental illness and various reviews support its effectiveness in this patient group. However, to date there is no review available regarding the effectiveness of youth-ACT. It is unknown whether youth-ACT is as effective as it is in adults. This review aims to assess the effects of youth-ACT on severity of psychiatric symptoms, general functioning, and psychiatric hospital admissions.

methodA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsychINFO and CINAHL published up to March 2017. To assess methodological quality of the included studies, the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine grading system was used.

resultsThirteen studies were included in this review. There are indications that youth-ACT is effective in reducing severity of psychiatric symptoms, improving general functioning, and reducing duration and frequency of psychiatric hospital admissions.

conclusionsThe current literature on youth-ACT is limited but promising. There are indications that youth-ACT is effective in reducing severity of psychiatric symptoms, improving general functioning, and reducing duration and frequency of psychiatric hospital admissions. The effect of youth-ACT may be comparable with the effect of ACT in adults. Similar as in adult ACT, the studies on youth-ACT found effects that vary from small to large. Randomized experimental research designs are needed to further corroborate effectiveness.

Indexed as

Adolescent Health ServicesChild Health ServicesCommunity Mental Health ServicesAdolescentChildHospitalizationHumansMental DisordersAdolescentAssertive community treatmentAssertive outreachReview

Identifiers

PMID28768492
PMCPMC5541424
OpenAlexW2741663361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.