Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28767737›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Tissue engineering potential of human dermis-isolated adult stem cells from multiple anatomical locations.

Heenam Kwon, Anne K Haudenschild, Wendy E Brown, Natalia Vapniarsky, Nikolaos K Paschos, Boaz Arzi, Jerry C Hu, Kyriacos A Athanasiou

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heenam KwonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America.
Anne K HaudenschildDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America.
Wendy E BrownDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America.
Natalia VapniarskyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America.
Nikolaos K PaschosDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Penn Sports Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Boaz ArziDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States of America.
Jerry C HuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America.
Kyriacos A AthanasiouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-8405

Funding

Comparative Medical Science Training ProgramT32OD011147 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI JEROEN SAEIJ, Sara Michelle Thomasy · 2012 to 2026
$5.5M
Early Regulation of Immunity in the Respiratory TractR01AI055881 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI BAUMGARTH, NICOLE · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI055881NIH HHS T32 OD011147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abundance and accessibility render skin-derived stem cells an attractive cell source for tissue engineering applications. Toward assessing their utility, the variability of constructs engineered from human dermis-isolated adult stem (hDIAS) cells was examined with respect to different anatomical locations (foreskin, breast, and abdominal skin), both in vitro and in a subcutaneous, athymic mouse model. All anatomical locations yielded hDIAS cells with multi-lineage differentiation potentials, though adipogenesis was not seen for foreskin-derived hDIAS cells. Using engineered cartilage as a model, tissue engineered constructs from hDIAS cells were compared. Construct morphology differed by location. The mechanical properties of human foreskin- and abdominal skin-derived constructs were similar at implantation, remaining comparable after 4 additional weeks of culture in vivo. Breast skin-derived constructs were not mechanically testable. For all groups, no signs of abnormality were observed in the host. Addition of aggregate redifferentiation culture prior to construct formation improved chondrogenic differentiation of foreskin-derived hDIAS cells, as evident by increases in glycosaminoglycan and collagen contents. More robust Alcian blue staining and homogeneous cell populations were also observed compared to controls. Human DIAS cells elicited no adverse host responses, reacted positively to chondrogenic regimens, and possessed multi-lineage differentiation potential with the caveat that efficacy may differ by anatomical origin of the skin. Taken together, these results suggest that hDIAS cells hold promise as a potential cell source for a number of tissue engineering applications.

Indexed as

Adult Stem CellsAnimalsBreastCartilageCell DifferentiationDermisFemaleForeskinHumansMaleMiceModels, BiologicalTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID28767737
PMCPMC5540597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.