Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28767703›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Simulated space radiation sensitizes bone but not muscle to the catabolic effects of mechanical unloading.

Andrew R Krause, Toni L Speacht, Yue Zhang, Charles H Lang, Henry J Donahue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Soluble RANKL exaggerates hindlimb suspension-induced osteopenia but not muscle protein balance.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The individual and combined effects of spaceflight radiation and microgravity on biologic systems and functional outcomes.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew R KrauseDepartment of Orthopaedics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Toni L SpeachtDepartment of Orthopaedics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Yue ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Engineering, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.
Charles H LangDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Henry J DonahueDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Engineering, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9238-4157

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep space travel exposes astronauts to extended periods of space radiation and mechanical unloading, both of which may induce significant muscle and bone loss. Astronauts are exposed to space radiation from solar particle events (SPE) and background radiation referred to as galactic cosmic radiation (GCR). To explore interactions between skeletal muscle and bone under these conditions, we hypothesized that decreased mechanical load, as in the microgravity of space, would lead to increased susceptibility to space radiation-induced bone and muscle loss. We evaluated changes in bone and muscle of mice exposed to hind limb suspension (HLS) unloading alone or in addition to proton and high (H) atomic number (Z) and energy (E) (HZE) (16O) radiation. Adult male C57Bl/6J mice were randomly assigned to six groups: No radiation ± HLS, 50 cGy proton radiation ± HLS, and 50 cGy proton radiation + 10 cGy 16O radiation ± HLS. Radiation alone did not induce bone or muscle loss, whereas HLS alone resulted in both bone and muscle loss. Absolute trabecular and cortical bone volume fraction (BV/TV) was decreased 24% and 6% in HLS-no radiation vs the normally loaded no-radiation group. Trabecular thickness and mineral density also decreased with HLS. For some outcomes, such as BV/TV, trabecular number and tissue mineral density, additional bone loss was observed in the HLS+proton+HZE radiation group compared to HLS alone. In contrast, whereas HLS alone decreased muscle mass (19% gastrocnemius, 35% quadriceps), protein synthesis, and increased proteasome activity, radiation did not exacerbate these catabolic outcomes. Our results suggest that combining simulated space radiation with HLS results in additional bone loss that may not be experienced by muscle.

Indexed as

AnimalsCancellous BoneCortical BoneCosmic RadiationHindlimb SuspensionMaleMiceMuscle, SkeletalRandom AllocationSolar ActivitySpace SimulationX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID28767703
PMCPMC5540592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.