Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28767668›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Creative foraging: An experimental paradigm for studying exploration and discovery.

Yuval Hart, Avraham E Mayo, Ruth Mayo, Liron Rozenkrantz, Avichai Tendler, Uri Alon, Lior Noy

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07556250 (Investigating Cognitive Flexibility Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07556250 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Investigating Cognitive Flexibility Training

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanyang Technological UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled225ConditionsHealthyArmsExperimental (Implicit Training): Structure Learning Training, Active Control (Explicit Training): 'All You Can E.T.'
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. On the social nature of abstraction: cognitive implications of interaction and diversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuval HartThe Theatre Lab, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6107-2169
Avraham E MayoThe Theatre Lab, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Ruth MayoDepartment of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Liron RozenkrantzThe Theatre Lab, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Avichai TendlerThe Theatre Lab, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Uri AlonThe Theatre Lab, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Lior NoyThe Theatre Lab, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Creative exploration is central to science, art and cognitive development. However, research on creative exploration is limited by a lack of high-resolution automated paradigms. To address this, we present such an automated paradigm, the creative foraging game, in which people search for novel and valuable solutions in a large and well-defined space made of all possible shapes made of ten connected squares. Players discovered shape categories such as digits, letters, and airplanes as well as more abstract categories. They exploited each category, then dropped it to explore once again, and so on. Aligned with a prediction of optimal foraging theory (OFT), during exploration phases, people moved along meandering paths that are about three times longer than the shortest paths between shapes; when exploiting a category of related shapes, they moved along the shortest paths. The moment of discovery of a new category was usually done at a non-prototypical and ambiguous shape, which can serve as an experimental proxy for creative leaps. People showed individual differences in their search patterns, along a continuum between two strategies: a mercurial quick-to-discover/quick-to-drop strategy and a thorough slow-to-discover/slow-to-drop strategy. Contrary to optimal foraging theory, players leave exploitation to explore again far before categories are depleted. This paradigm opens the way for automated high-resolution study of creative exploration.

Indexed as

Exploratory BehaviorGame TheoryHumans

Identifiers

PMID28767668
PMCPMC5540595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.