ArticlePloS one2017
Creative foraging: An experimental paradigm for studying exploration and discovery.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07556250 (Investigating Cognitive Flexibility Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Investigating Cognitive Flexibility Training
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flexible autonomic nervous system dynamics underlie attentional engagement in infancy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Optimally sequencing semantic search predicts creativity.PloS one · 2026Article
- De-sync: disruption of synchronization as a key factor in individual and collective creative processes.BMC neuroscience · 2024Review
- Predicting social experience from dyadic interaction dynamics: the BallGame, a novel paradigm to study social engagement.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Evidence for optimal semantic search throughout adulthood.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- On the social nature of abstraction: cognitive implications of interaction and diversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Study protocol: How does cognitive flexibility relate to other executive functions and learning in healthy young adults?PloS one · 2023Article
- An investigation of the cognitive and neural correlates of semantic memory search related to creative ability.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Creative exploration as a scale-invariant search on a meaning landscape.Nature communications · 2018Article
- The Dynamics of Creative Ideation: Introducing a New Assessment Paradigm.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Placebo can enhance creativity.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Creative exploration is central to science, art and cognitive development. However, research on creative exploration is limited by a lack of high-resolution automated paradigms. To address this, we present such an automated paradigm, the creative foraging game, in which people search for novel and valuable solutions in a large and well-defined space made of all possible shapes made of ten connected squares. Players discovered shape categories such as digits, letters, and airplanes as well as more abstract categories. They exploited each category, then dropped it to explore once again, and so on. Aligned with a prediction of optimal foraging theory (OFT), during exploration phases, people moved along meandering paths that are about three times longer than the shortest paths between shapes; when exploiting a category of related shapes, they moved along the shortest paths. The moment of discovery of a new category was usually done at a non-prototypical and ambiguous shape, which can serve as an experimental proxy for creative leaps. People showed individual differences in their search patterns, along a continuum between two strategies: a mercurial quick-to-discover/quick-to-drop strategy and a thorough slow-to-discover/slow-to-drop strategy. Contrary to optimal foraging theory, players leave exploitation to explore again far before categories are depleted. This paradigm opens the way for automated high-resolution study of creative exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.