Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28767640›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2017

Efficacy and Safety of 3 Different Anesthesia Techniques Used in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Chengwei Liang, Jionglin Wei, Xiaoxi Cai, Weilong Lin, Yongqian Fan, Fengjian Yang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04166188 (Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04166188 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block: Cadaveric Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao Paulo General HospitalRan2019 to 2020Enrolled7ConditionsPain, Regional Anesthesia Morbidity, Arthroplasty ComplicationsArmsLumbar erector spinae plane block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chengwei LiangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Jionglin WeiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Xiaoxi CaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Weilong LinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Yongqian FanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Fengjian YangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Fudan University · CNHuadong Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study compared the efficacy and safety of 3 different anesthesia techniques used in total hip arthroplasty (THA). MATERIAL AND METHODS We allocated 198 patients preparing to undertake THA into 3 groups: general anesthesia group (GA group, n=66), caudal epidural anesthesia group (CEA group, n=66), and spinal-epidural anesthesia group (SEA group, n=66). We compared postoperative adverse effects occurring in patients of the 3 anesthesia groups. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Minimum Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, and β-amyloid (Aβ) expression were calculated to determine the effects of different anesthesia on the postoperative pain and cognitive dysfunction of patients. RESULTS The CEA and SEA groups had lower rates of perioperative adverse effects than in the GA group. Patients in the GA group required significantly higher administration of analgesics after the surgery than those in CEA and SEA groups. Higher Aβ expression levels and VAS scores, as well as lower MMSE scores, were also seen in the GA group compared with the other 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS CEA and SEA were more effective than GA in THA, and CEA seemed to be a better anesthesia technique than SEA.

Indexed as

AgedAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnesthesiaArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementPerioperative CarePostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeAmyloid beta-Peptides

Identifiers

PMID28767640
PMCPMC5549712
OpenAlexW2740742311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.