Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28767562›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2019

Deleterious Effect of RAS and Evolutionary High-risk TP53 Double Mutation in Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Yun Shin Chun, Guillaume Passot, Suguru Yamashita, Maliha Nusrat, Panagiotis Katsonis, Jonathan M Loree, Claudius Conrad, Ching-Wei D Tzeng, Lianchun Xiao, Thomas A Aloia and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association ofGenetics research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The AUTACE That Degrades KRAS and Engages CD8Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Integrative genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant prognostic markers for colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Precision immune regulation in KRAS-mutated cancers: the final piece of the puzzle?Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. FROM ONCOLOGIST TO SURGEON - GENETICS IN COLORECTAL METASTASIS FOR SURGEONS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yun Shin ChunDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Guillaume PassotDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Suguru YamashitaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Maliha NusratDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Panagiotis KatsonisDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Jonathan M LoreeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Claudius ConradDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ching-Wei D TzengDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Lianchun XiaoDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Thomas A AloiaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Cathy EngDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Scott E KopetzDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Olivier LichtargeDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Jean-Nicolas VautheyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Functional Determinnats in G Protein-coupled ReceptorsR01GM066099 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LICHTARGE, OLIVIER · 2003 to 2022
$7.5M
Comparative genomics of protein structure and functionR01GM079656 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LICHTARGE, OLIVIER · 2007 to 2019
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066099NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the impact of somatic gene mutations on survival among patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

backgroundPatients undergoing CLM resection have heterogeneous outcomes, and accurate risk stratification is necessary to optimize patient selection for surgery.

methodsNext-generation sequencing of 50 cancer-related genes was performed from primary tumors and/or liver metastases in 401 patients undergoing CLM resection. Missense TP53 mutations were classified by the evolutionary action score (EAp53)-a novel approach that dichotomizes mutations as low or high risk.

resultsThe most frequent somatic gene mutations were TP53 (65.6%), followed by KRAS (48.1%) and APC (47.4%). Double mutation in RAS/TP53, identified in 31.4% of patients, was correlated with primary tumor location in the right colon (P = 0.006). On multivariable analysis, RAS/TP53 double mutation was an independent predictor of shorter overall survival (hazard ratio 2.62, 95% confidence interval 1.41-4.87, P = 0.002). In patients with co-mutated RAS, EAp53 high-risk mutations were associated with shorter 5-year overall survival of 12.2%, compared with 55.7% for TP53 wild type (P < 0.001). The negative prognostic effects of RAS and TP53 mutations were limited to tumors harboring mutations in both genes.

conclusionsConcomitant RAS and TP53 mutations are associated with decreased survival after CLM resection. A high EAp53 predicts a subset of patients with worse prognosis. These preliminary analyses suggest that surgical resection of liver metastases should be carefully considered in this subset of patients.

Indexed as

HepatectomyMutationAdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Risk AssessmentSurvival RateTumor Suppressor Protein p53GTP PhosphohydrolasesHRAS protein, humanKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID28767562
PMCPMC7462436
OpenAlexW2740497784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.