ArticleEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2017
The "Residential" Effect Fallacy in Neighborhood and Health Studies: Formal Definition, Empirical Identification, and Correction.
Article in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Neighborhood-Level Influences on HIV Vulnerability.AIDS and behavior · 2022Pooled it
- Activity spaces in studies of the environment and physical activity: A review and synthesis of implications for causality.Health & place · 2019Pooled it
- Assessing the relationship between space-time behaviours and personal noise exposure using isotemporal substitution models in the Grand Paris area.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Article
- Distance from home and working memory: daily associations varying by neighborhood environments in community-dwelling older adults.European journal of ageing · 2025Article
- Neighbourhood socioeconomic improvement, residential mobility and premature death: a population-based cohort study and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.International journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Geographic clustering of travel-acquired infections in Ontario, Canada, 2008-2020.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Neighborhood social organization exposures and racial/ethnic disparities in hypertension risk in Los Angeles.PloS one · 2023Article
- Mediating role of walking between perceived and objective walkability and cognitive function in older adults.Health & place · 2023Article
- The Weight of Place: Built Environment Correlates of Obesity and Diabetes.Endocrine reviews · 2022Review
- Associations between neighborhood built environment, residential property values, and adult BMI change: The Seattle Obesity Study III.SSM - population health · 2022Article
- Community social environments and cigarette smoking.SSM - population health · 2022Article
- GPS-based activity space exposure to greenness and walkability is associated with increased accelerometer-based physical activity.Environment international · 2022Article
- Quantifying the effect of human population mobility on malaria risk in the Peruvian Amazon.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Determining thresholds for spatial urban design and transport features that support walking to create healthy and sustainable cities: findings from the IPEN Adult study.The Lancet. Global health · 2022Review
- Exploring the spatial scale effects of built environments on transport walking: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.Health & place · 2022Article
- Exploring Associations Between Children's Obesogenic Behaviors and the Local Environment Using Big Data: Development and Evaluation of the Obesity Prevention Dashboard.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Article
- Measurement of neighborhood-based physical activity bouts.Health & place · 2021Article
- Measuring small-area violent crime: a comparison of observed versus model-estimated crime rates and preterm birth.Annals of epidemiology · 2021Article
- Longitudinal impact of changes in the residential built environment on physical activity: findings from the ENABLE London cohort study.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020Article
- Residential neighborhood features associated with objectively measured walking near home: Revisiting walkability using the Automatic Context Measurement Tool (ACMT).Health & place · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBecause of confounding from the urban/rural and socioeconomic organizations of territories and resulting correlation between residential and nonresidential exposures, classically estimated residential neighborhood-outcome associations capture nonresidential environment effects, overestimating residential intervention effects. Our study diagnosed and corrected this "residential" effect fallacy bias applicable to a large fraction of neighborhood and health studies.
methodsOur empirical application investigated the effect that hypothetical interventions raising the residential number of services would have on the probability that a trip is walked. Using global positioning systems tracking and mobility surveys over 7 days (227 participants and 7440 trips), we employed a multilevel linear probability model to estimate the trip-level association between residential number of services and walking to derive a naïve intervention effect estimate and a corrected model accounting for numbers of services at the residence, trip origin, and trip destination to determine a corrected intervention effect estimate (true effect conditional on assumptions).
resultsThere was a strong correlation in service densities between the residential neighborhood and nonresidential places. From the naïve model, hypothetical interventions raising the residential number of services to 200, 500, and 1000 were associated with an increase by 0.020, 0.055, and 0.109 of the probability of walking in the intervention groups. Corrected estimates were of 0.007, 0.019, and 0.039. Thus, naïve estimates were overestimated by multiplicative factors of 3.0, 2.9, and 2.8.
conclusionsCommonly estimated residential intervention-outcome associations substantially overestimate true effects. Our somewhat paradoxical conclusion is that to estimate residential effects, investigators critically need information on nonresidential places visited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28767516What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.