Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28767499›Full record

ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2017

Clinician-Investigator Training and the Need to Pilot New Approaches to Recruiting and Retaining This Workforce.

Alison K Hall, Sherry L Mills, P Kay Lund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The Clinician-Scientist Radiology Residency Pathway: Cultivating Leaders in Radiology Research and Innovation.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2025
    Article
  3. Development, Review, and Activation of Thoracic Oncology Investigator-Initiated Trials.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Research in orthopaedic trauma surgery: approaches of basic scientists and clinicians and the relevance of interprofessional research teams.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Drug Abuse Research Training (DART) Program for Psychiatry Residents and Summer Fellows: 15-Year Outcomes.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  14. Physician-scientists in the United States at 2020: Trends and concerns.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alison K HallA.K. Hall was deputy director, Division of Training, Workforce Development, and Diversity, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, at the time this work was completed. She is now associate dean of research workforce development, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC. S.L. Mills is director, Office of Extramural Programs, Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. P.K. Lund is director, Division of Biomedical Research Workforce, Office of Extramural Programs, Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Sherry L Mills
P Kay Lund

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinician-investigators, also called physician-scientists, offer critical knowledge and perspectives that benefit research on basic science mechanisms, improved diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, population and outcomes medicine, health policy, and health services, yet few clinically trained health professionals pursue a research career. Sustaining this workforce requires attention to the unique challenges faced by investigators who must achieve clinical and research competence during training and their careers. These challenges include the duration of required clinical training, limited or discontinuous research opportunities, high levels of educational debt, balancing the dual obligations and rewards of clinical care and research, competition for research funding, and the need for leadership development after training. Women and individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups comprise a small percentage of this workforce.The authors summarize the recent literature on training for clinician-investigators, emphasizing approaches with encouraging outcomes that warrant broader implementation. Using this overview as background, they convened three workshops at the National Institutes of Health in 2016 to identify and refine key priorities for potential new pilot programs to recruit and retain the clinician-investigator workforce. From these workshops emerged three priorities for future pilot programs: (1) support for research in residency, (2) new research on-ramps for health professionals at multiple career stages, and (3) national networks to diversify and sustain clinician-investigator faculty. Implementation of any pilot program will require coordinated commitment from academic health centers, medical licensing/certification boards, professional societies, and clinician-investigators themselves, in addition to support from the National Institutes of Health.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMinority GroupsPersonnel SelectionPilot ProjectsResearch PersonnelUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28767499
PMCPMC5625951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.