Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28767366›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2018

Detector Blur and Correlated Noise Modeling for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction.

Jiabei Zheng, Jeffrey A Fessler, Heang-Ping Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. On the Analyses of Medical Images Using Traditional Machine Learning Techniques and Convolutional Neural Networks.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Imaging of fiber-like structures in digital breast tomosynthesis.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiabei Zheng
Jeffrey A Fessler
Heang-Ping Chan

Funding

Improvement of microcalcification detection in digital breast tomosynthesisR01CA151443 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHAN, HEANG-PING · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes a new image reconstruction method for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). The new method incorporates detector blur into the forward model. The detector blur in DBT causes correlation in the measurement noise. By making a few approximations that are reasonable for breast imaging, we formulated a regularized quadratic optimization problem with a data-fit term that incorporates models for detector blur and correlated noise (DBCN). We derived a computationally efficient separable quadratic surrogate (SQS) algorithm to solve the optimization problem that has a non-diagonal noise covariance matrix. We evaluated the SQS-DBCN method by reconstructing DBT scans of breast phantoms and human subjects. The contrast-to-noise ratio and sharpness of microcalcifications were analyzed and compared with those by the simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique. The quality of soft tissue lesions and parenchymal patterns was examined. The results demonstrate the potential to improve the image quality of reconstructed DBT images by incorporating the system physics model. This paper is a first step toward model-based iterative reconstruction for DBT.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMammographyPhantoms, ImagingRadiographic Image Enhancement

Identifiers

PMID28767366
PMCPMC5772655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.