ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2017
Heart Rate Detection Using Microsoft Kinect: Validation and Comparison to Wearable Devices.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03913663 (A Model Based Study for Gait in Heminglect Patient Pre and Post Vestibul-ocular Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Model Based Study for Gait in Heminglect Patient Pre and Post Vestibul-ocular Rehabilitation
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiorespiratory DB: Collection of cardiorespiratory data acquired during normal breathing, deep breathing and breath holding.Data in brief · 2024Article
- Deep learning and remote photoplethysmography powered advancements in contactless physiological measurement.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Contactless Camera-Based Heart Rate and Respiratory Rate Monitoring Using AI on Hardware.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Identification of Respiration Types Through Respiratory Signal Derived From Clinical and Wearable Electrocardiograms.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2023Article
- On the spatial phase distribution of cutaneous low-frequency perfusion oscillations.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Preclinical evaluation of noncontact vital signs monitoring using real-time IR-UWB radar and factors affecting its accuracy.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Detection of Breathing Movements of Preterm Neonates by Recording Their Abdominal Movements with a Time-of-Flight Camera.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Noncontact Sensing of Contagion.Journal of imaging · 2021Review
- Simultaneously acquired data from contactless and wearable devices for direct and indirect heart-rate measurement.Data in brief · 2019Article
- Preclinical Evaluation of a Noncontact Simultaneous Monitoring Method for Respiration and Carotid Pulsation Using Impulse-Radio Ultra-Wideband Radar.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- A Clinically Evaluated Interferometric Continuous-Wave Radar System for the Contactless Measurement of Human Vital Parameters.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- A Novel Non-contact Heart Rate Monitor Using Impulse-Radio Ultra-Wideband (IR-UWB) Radar Technology.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Taking Systems Medicine to Heart.Circulation research · 2018Review
- Detection of Cardiopulmonary Activity and Related Abnormal Events Using Microsoft Kinect Sensor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contactless detection is one of the new frontiers of technological innovation in the field of healthcare, enabling unobtrusive measurements of biomedical parameters. Compared to conventional methods for Heart Rate (HR) detection that employ expensive and/or uncomfortable devices, such as the Electrocardiograph (ECG) or pulse oximeter, contactless HR detection offers fast and continuous monitoring of heart activities and provides support for clinical analysis without the need for the user to wear a device. This paper presents a validation study for a contactless HR estimation method exploiting RGB (Red, Green, Blue) data from a Microsoft Kinect v2 device. This method, based on Eulerian Video Magnification (EVM), Photoplethysmography (PPG) and Videoplethysmography (VPG), can achieve performance comparable to classical approaches exploiting wearable systems, under specific test conditions. The output given by a Holter, which represents the gold-standard device used in the test for ECG extraction, is considered as the ground-truth, while a comparison with a commercial smartwatch is also included. The validation process is conducted with two modalities that differ for the availability of a priori knowledge about the subjects' normal HR. The two test modalities provide different results. In particular, the HR estimation differs from the ground-truth by 2% when the knowledge about the subject's lifestyle and his/her HR is considered and by 3.4% if no information about the person is taken into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.