Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28766984›Full record

ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2017

Long-term effect of parasympathetic or sympathetic denervation on intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and apoptosis.

Elizabeth A Davis, Martha C Washington, Emily R Yaniz, Heidi Phillips, Ayman I Sayegh, Megan J Dailey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A Davis1 Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, 61801, USA.
Martha C Washington2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, 36088, USA.
Emily R Yaniz1 Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, 61801, USA.
Heidi Phillips3 Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, 61802, USA.
Ayman I Sayegh2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, 36088, USA.
Megan J Dailey1 Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, 61801, USA.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USTuskegee University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intestinal epithelial tissue is constantly regenerated as a means to maintain proper tissue function. Previous studies have demonstrated that denervation of the parasympathetic or sympathetic nervous system to the intestine alters this process. However, results are inconsistent between studies, showing both increases and decreases in proliferation after denervation of the parasympathetic or sympathetic. The effect appears to correlate with (1) the timing post-denervation, (2) denervation-induced changes in food intake, (3) the denervation technique used, and (4) which intestinal segment is investigated. Thus, we proposed that parasympathetic or sympathetic denervation does not have an effect on intestinal epithelial regeneration when you (1) evaluate denervation after long-term denervation, (2) control for post-surgical changes in food intake, (3) use minimally invasive surgical techniques and (4) include a segmental analysis. To test this, adult male Sprague Dawley rats underwent parasympathetic denervation via subdiaphragmatic vagotomy, sympathetic denervation via celiacomesenteric ganglionectomy, a parasympathetic denervation sham surgery, or a sympathetic denervation sham surgery. Sham surgery ad libitum-fed groups and sham surgery pair-fed groups were used to control for surgically induced changes in food intake. Three weeks post-surgery, animals were sacrificed and tissue from the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum was excised and immunohistochemically processed to visualize indicators of proliferation (bromodeoxyuridine-positive cells) and apoptosis (caspase-3-positive cells). Results showed no differences between groups in proliferation, apoptosis, or total cell number in any intestinal segment. These results suggest that parasympathetic or sympathetic denervation does not have a significant long-term effect on intestinal epithelial turnover. Thus, intestinal epithelial regeneration is able to recover after autonomic nervous system injury. Impact statement This study investigates the long-term effect of autonomic denervation on intestinal epithelial cell turnover, as measured by proliferation, apoptosis, and total cell number. Although previous research has established that autonomic denervation can alter intestinal epithelial turnover under short-term conditions, here we establish for the first time that these changes do not persist long-term when you control for surgical-induced changes in food intake and use targeted denervation procedures. These findings add to the base of knowledge on autonomic control of tissue turnover, highlight the ability of the intestinal epithelium to recover after autonomic injury and reveal possible implications of the use of ANS denervation for disease treatment in humans.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCell ProliferationParasympathectomySympathectomyAnimalsBromodeoxyuridineCaspase 3Epithelial CellsImmunohistochemistryIntestine, SmallMaleRats, Sprague-DawleyTimeBromodeoxyuridineCaspase 3apoptosisIntestinal epitheliumparasympatheticproliferationregenerationsympathetic

Identifiers

PMID28766984
PMCPMC5648292
OpenAlexW2740293508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.