ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2017
A Cell-Based High-Throughput Method for Identifying Modulators of Alternative Splicing.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PCBP1 regulates alternative splicing of AARS2 in congenital cardiomyopathy.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Alternative splicing, a key regulatory process of gene expression, is controlled by trans-acting factors that recognize cis-elements in premature RNA transcripts to affect spliceosome assembly and splice site choices. Extracellular stimuli and signaling cascades can converge on RNA binding splicing regulators to affect alternative splicing. Defects in splicing regulation have been associated with various human diseases, and modification of disease-causing splicing events presents great therapeutic promise. Determining splicing regulators and/or upstream modulators has been difficult with low throughput, low sensitivity, and low specificity. IRAS (identifying regulators of alternative splicing) is a novel cell-based high-throughput screening strategy designed specifically to address these challenges and has achieved high throughput, high sensitivity, and high specificity. Here, we describe the IRAS method in detail with a pair of dual-fluorescence minigene reporters that produces GFP and RFP fluorescent signals to assay the two spliced isoforms exclusively. These two complementary mini-gene reporters alter GFP/RFP output ratios in the opposite direction in response to only a true splicing change. False positives from a signal screen do not stimulate opposite changes in GFP/RFP ratios. The reporter pair in conjunction with robotic liquid handlers and arrayed libraries allows IRAS to screen for both positive and negative splicing regulators with high sensitivity and specificity in a high-throughput manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.