ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2017
Biology and management of Avena fatua and Avena ludoviciana: two noxious weed species of agro-ecosystems.
Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reference genome and population genomic analyses reveal insight into herbicide tolerance in Avena fatua L.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Exploration of the genetic diversity of Avena Fatua L. (wild oat) through genotyping-by-sequencing and SDS-PAGE.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- The potential spatiotemporal distribution patterns of Avena nuda and Avena sativa from global perspective provide new insights for the cultivation of commonly cultivated oats.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Fitness ofBiology · 2024Article
- Application of artificial neural networks to classify Avena fatua and Avena sterilis based on seed traits: insights from European Avena populations primarily from the Balkan Region.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of growth cycles among three weedy Avena species: Insights from field observations.PloS one · 2024Article
- Effects of nitrogen addition and plant litter manipulation on soil fungal and bacterial communities in a semiarid sandy land.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Is Every Wild Species a Rich Source of Disease Resistance?Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Laboratory and Field Evaluation of the Phytotoxic Activity ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Agricultural Weed Assessment Calculator: An Australian Evaluation.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Article
- A global perspective on the biology, impact and management of Chenopodium album and Chenopodium murale: two troublesome agricultural and environmental weeds.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019Review
- Architectural Response of Wheat Cultivars to Row Spacing Reveals Altered Perception of Plant Density.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Automated phenotyping for early vigour of field pea seedlings in controlled environment by colour imaging technology.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Avena fatua and Avena ludoviciana are closely related grass weed species infesting a large number of crops around the world. These species are widely distributed in diverse agro-ecosystems from temperate to sub-tropical regions due to their unique seed traits, successful germination ecology, high competitive ability, and allelopathic potential. A. fatua is more widespread, adaptable, and problematic than A. ludoviciana. Both these species infest major winter and spring crops, including wheat, oat, barley, canola, maize, alfalfa, and sunflower, causing up to 70% yield losses depending on crop species and weed density. Chemical control has been challenged by large-scale herbicide resistance evolution in these weed species. A. fatua is the most widespread herbicide-resistant weed in the world, infesting about 5 million hectares in 13 countries. The use of alternative herbicides with different modes of action has proved effective. Several cultural practices, including diverse crop rotations, cover crops, improved crop competition (using competitive cultivars, high seed rates, narrow row spacing, altered crop geometry), and allelopathic suppression, have shown promise for controlling A. fatua and A. ludoviciana. The integrated use of these cultural methods can reduce the herbicide dose required, and lower dependency on herbicides to control these grasses. Moreover, integrated management may successfully control herbicide-resistant populations of these weed species. The use of integrated approaches based on the knowledge of biology and ecology of A. fatua and A. ludoviciana may help to manage them sustainably in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28766148What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.