Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28766148›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2017

Biology and management of Avena fatua and Avena ludoviciana: two noxious weed species of agro-ecosystems.

Ali Ahsan Bajwa, Muhammad Javaid Akhter, Nadeem Iqbal, Arslan Masood Peerzada, Zarka Hanif, Sudheesh Manalil, Saima Hashim, Hafiz Haider Ali, Lynda Kebaso, David Frimpong and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fitness ofBiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ali Ahsan BajwaSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia. a.bajwa@uq.edu.au.
Muhammad Javaid AkhterDepartment of Agronomy, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Punjab, 38400, Pakistan.
Nadeem IqbalSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia.
Arslan Masood PeerzadaSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia.
Zarka HanifDepartment of Agronomy, University College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan.
Sudheesh ManalilThe Centre for Plant Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia.
Saima HashimDepartment of Weed Science, University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 25000, Pakistan.
Hafiz Haider AliDepartment of Agronomy, University College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, 40100, Pakistan.
Lynda KebasoSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia.
David FrimpongSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia.
Halima NamubiruThe Centre for Plant Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia.
Bhagirath Singh ChauhanThe Centre for Plant Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Avena fatua and Avena ludoviciana are closely related grass weed species infesting a large number of crops around the world. These species are widely distributed in diverse agro-ecosystems from temperate to sub-tropical regions due to their unique seed traits, successful germination ecology, high competitive ability, and allelopathic potential. A. fatua is more widespread, adaptable, and problematic than A. ludoviciana. Both these species infest major winter and spring crops, including wheat, oat, barley, canola, maize, alfalfa, and sunflower, causing up to 70% yield losses depending on crop species and weed density. Chemical control has been challenged by large-scale herbicide resistance evolution in these weed species. A. fatua is the most widespread herbicide-resistant weed in the world, infesting about 5 million hectares in 13 countries. The use of alternative herbicides with different modes of action has proved effective. Several cultural practices, including diverse crop rotations, cover crops, improved crop competition (using competitive cultivars, high seed rates, narrow row spacing, altered crop geometry), and allelopathic suppression, have shown promise for controlling A. fatua and A. ludoviciana. The integrated use of these cultural methods can reduce the herbicide dose required, and lower dependency on herbicides to control these grasses. Moreover, integrated management may successfully control herbicide-resistant populations of these weed species. The use of integrated approaches based on the knowledge of biology and ecology of A. fatua and A. ludoviciana may help to manage them sustainably in the future.

Indexed as

AvenaCrops, AgriculturalHerbicide ResistancePlant WeedsWeed ControlCerealsCrop competitionHerbicide resistanceWeed managementWild oats

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.