Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28766132›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2017

Prognostic and predictive importance of the estrogen receptor coactivator AIB1 in a randomized trial comparing adjuvant letrozole and tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer: the Danish cohort of BIG 1-98.

S Alkner, M-B Jensen, B B Rasmussen, P-O Bendahl, M Fernö, L Rydén, H Mouridsen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Prognosis according to the timing of recurrence in breast cancer.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S AlknerDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Sara.Alkner@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8683-9971
M-B JensenDanish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
B B RasmussenDanish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
P-O BendahlDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
M FernöDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
L RydénDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
H MouridsenDanish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group
Lund University · SECopenhagen University Hospital · DKHerlev Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the estrogen receptor coactivator amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) as a prognostic marker, as well as a predictive marker for response to adjuvant tamoxifen and/or aromatase inhibitors, in early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

methodAIB1 was analyzed with immunohistochemistry in tissue microarrays of the Danish subcohort (N = 1396) of the International Breast Cancer Study Group's trial BIG 1-98 (randomization between adjuvant tamoxifen versus letrozole versus the sequence of the two drugs).

resultsForty-six percent of the tumors had a high AIB1 expression. In line with previous studies, AIB1 correlated to a more aggressive tumor-phenotype (HER2 amplification and a high malignancy grade). High AIB1 also correlated to higher estrogen receptor expression (80-100 vs. 1-79%), and ductal histological type. High AIB1 expression was associated with a poor disease-free survival (univariable: hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.63. Multivariable: hazard ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.58) and overall survival (univariable: hazard ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.68. Multivariable: hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.60). HER2 did not seem to modify the prognostic effect of AIB1. No difference in treatment effect between tamoxifen and letrozole in relation to AIB1 was found.

conclusionsIn a subset of the large international randomized trial BIG 1-98, we confirm AIB1 to be a strong prognostic factor in early breast cancer. Hence, although tumor AIB1 expression does not seem to be useful for the choice of tamoxifen versus an aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal endocrine-responsive breast cancer, AIB1 is an interesting target for new anti-cancer therapies and further investigations of this biomarker is warranted.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLetrozoleNeoplasm GradingNitrilesNuclear Receptor Coactivator 3PostmenopausePrognosisTamoxifenTissue Array AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorLetrozoleNCOA3 protein, humanNitrilesNuclear Receptor Coactivator 3TamoxifenTriazolesAmplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1)Aromatase inhibitorBIG 1-98Breast cancerRandomized trialTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID28766132
PMCPMC5668343
OpenAlexW2741907331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.