ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2017
Comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D (SF-12) contemporaneous utility scores in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of health-related quality of life changes in an Australian rapid access chest pain clinic.BMC health services research · 2025Trial
- Health-related quality of life and experience measures, to assess patients' experiences of peripheral intravenous catheters: a secondary data analysis.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2024Trial
- The effects and costs of home-based rehabilitation for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: The REACH-HF multicentre randomized controlled trial.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2019Trial
- Article
- Comparison of the measurement properties and consistency between the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-Y-3L in adolescents aged 15-17 in China.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2024Article
- Beyond MACE: a multidimensional approach to outcomes in clinical trials for older adults with stable ischemic heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Comparison of the measurement properties of SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L in a Chinese population health survey.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2022Article
- Article
- Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Testing of Yoruba Version of the EQ-5D Questionnaire in Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- How is quality of life defined and assessed in published research?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021Review
- Correspondence to European Heart Journal-Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes in response to paper by Thomas, M. et al. 2021: Predicting the EQ-5D from the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) in patients with heart failures.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2021Article
- Properties of the EQ-5D-3L index distribution when longitudinal data from 27,328 spine surgery procedures are applied to nine national EQ-5D-3L value sets.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SPVU-5D for measuring quality of life in patients with venous leg ulcers in an Australian setting.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Comparison between the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D quality of life (QOL) questionnaires in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) undergoing lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMulti-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) are widely used to measure utility weights. This study sought to compare utility weights of two popular MAUIs, the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D, and inform researchers in the selection of generic MAUI for use with cardiovascular (CVD) patients.
methodsData were collected in the Young@Heart study, a randomised controlled trial of a nurse-led multidisciplinary home-based intervention compared to standard usual care. Participants (n = 598) completed the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-12v2, from which the SF-6D can be constructed, at baseline and at 24-month follow-up. This study examined discrimination, responsiveness, correlation and differences across the two instruments.
resultsBoth MAUIs were able to discriminate between the NYHA severity classes and recorded similar changes between the two time points although only SF-6D differences were significant. Correlations between the dimensions of the two MAUIs were low. There were significant differences between the two instruments in mild conditions but they were similar in severe conditions. Substantial ceiling and floor effects were observed.
conclusionsOur findings indicate that the EQ-5D and the SF-6D cover different spaces in health due to their classification systems. Both measures were capable of discriminating between severity groups and responsive to quality of life changes in the follow-up. It is recommended to use the EQ-5D-3L in severe and the SF-6D in mild CVD conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28766084What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.