Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28766025›Full record

Observational studyNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2017

Determinants of botulinum toxin discontinuation in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study.

Pamela Latino, Letizia Castelli, Luca Prosperini, Maria Rita Marchetti, Carlo Pozzilli, Morena Giovannelli

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The barriers and facilitators to satisfaction with botulinum neurotoxin treatment in people with cervical dystonia: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nabiximols and botulinum toxin injections for patients with multiple sclerosis: efficacy on spasticity and spasms in a single-centre experience.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Botulinum toxin for the management of spasticity in multiple sclerosis: the Italian botulinum toxin network study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Observational
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. News on the journal Neurological Sciences in 2017.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pamela LatinoS. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Letizia CastelliS. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Luca ProsperiniDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University, Viale dell'Università 30, 00185, Rome, Italy. luca.prosperini@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3237-6267
Maria Rita MarchettiS. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Carlo PozzilliS. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Morena GiovannelliS. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the long-term persistence to treatment with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) for multiple sclerosis (MS)-related spasticity and the determinants of BoNT-A discontinuation in daily clinical setting. We retrospectively collected data of patients who started BoNT-A injections and underwent regular follow-up visits. Determinants of BoNT-A discontinuation were explored in a time-to-event Cox regression analysis which included as independent variables a large set of demographic and clinical characteristics. A total of 185 patients started BoNT-A injections from 2002 to 2014 and were followed up to September 2016. Of them, data on 121 were considered in our analysis. At follow-up, 53 (44%) patients were still on treatment and 68 (56%) patients discontinued BoNT-A after a median time of 1.2 years [interval 6 months to 7.4 years]. The reasons for discontinuation were loss of efficacy (n = 45), logistic problems or barriers to reach the structure (n = 16), and adverse events (n = 7). The absence of caregiver (hazard ratio = 1.69, p = 0.03) and lack of regular rehabilitation (hazard ratio = 1.78, p = 0.02) were two independent predictors for BoNT-A discontinuation. Our study confirms the beneficial effect of combining BoNT-A injections with rehabilitation and highlights the crucial role of caregivers for achieving better long-term outcomes in people with MS suffering from spasticity.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAdultAgedBotulinum Toxins, Type ACaregiversFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInjectionsKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisMuscle SpasticityNeuromuscular AgentsProportional Hazards ModelsBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular AgentsBotulinum toxinMultiple sclerosisObservational studySpasticityTreatment persistence

Identifiers

PMID28766025
OpenAlexW2742065578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.