ArticleNutrition research and practice2017
Validation of dietary reference intake equations for estimating energy requirements in Korean adults by using the doubly labeled water method.
Article in Nutrition research and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Energy Intake-Dependent Genetic Associations with Obesity Risk: BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism and Interactions with Dietary Bioactive Compounds.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of total energy intakes estimated by 24-hour diet recall with total energy expenditure measured by the doubly labeled water method in adults.Nutrition research and practice · 2022Article
- A narrative review on the application of doubly labeled water method for estimating energy requirement for Koreans.Nutrition research and practice · 2022Review
- Predictive equations for evaluation for resting energy expenditure in Brazilian patients with type 2 diabetes: what can we use?BMC nutrition · 2020Article
- Using physical activity levels to estimate energy requirements of female athletes.Journal of exercise nutrition & biochemistry · 2019Article
- Total energy expenditure in patients with colorectal cancer: associations with body composition, physical activity, and energy recommendations.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2019Article
- Validity of the dietary reference intakes for determining energy requirements in older adults.Nutrition research and practice · 2019Article
- Validity of predictive equations for resting energy expenditure in Korean non-obese adults.Nutrition research and practice · 2018Article
- Validation of Dietary Reference Intakes for predicting energy requirements in elementary school-age children.Nutrition research and practice · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe doubly labeled water (DLW) method is considered the gold standard for the measurement of total energy expenditure (TEE), which serves to estimate energy requirements. This study evaluated the accuracy of predictive dietary reference intake (DRI) equations for determining the estimated energy requirements (EER) of Korean adults by using the DLW as a reference method. SUBJECTS/
methodsSeventy-one participants (35 men and 36 women) aged between 20 and 49 years were included in the study. The subjects' EER, calculated by using the DRI equation (EER
resultsThe DRI equations for EER underestimated TEE by -36.3 kcal/day (-1.3%) in men and -104.5 kcal/day (-4.9%) in women. The percentages of accurate predictions among subjects were 77.1% in men and 62.9% in women. There was a strong linear correlation between EER
conclusionsThe present study supports the use of DRI prediction equations to determine EER in Korean adults. More studies are needed to confirm our results and to assess the validity of these equations in other population groups, including children, adolescents, and older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.