ArticleScientific reports2017
Role of Aortic Geometry on Stroke Propensity based on Simulations of Patient-Specific Models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of cerebrovascular morphology with ischaemic stroke considering intracranial stenosis.Brain communications · 2026Article
- The Impact of Aortic Arch Morphology on Periprocedural Stroke in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Numerical Study of Atrial Fibrillation Effects on Flow Distribution in Aortic Circulation.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is a life threatening event that is expected to more than double over the next 40 years. Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported as a strong independent risk factor for stroke. We have previously shown that a hemodynamic perturbation by AF or reduced cardiac output and cycle length may have a significant impact on clot trajectory and thus embolic stroke propensity through the left common carotid artery using an idealized aortic arch model. Here, we show the dependence of flow patterns and hence stroke propensity on geometry of patient-specific aortas. We performed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to determine the variations of AF-induced stroke propensity over various image-based patient-dependent aorta models. The results demonstrated that curvature pattern of aorta can play a determinant role in AF-induced stroke propensity alteration. Specifically, it was shown that the hemodynamic perturbation by AF considered led to substantial increase in stroke propensity (i.e., 2.5~3.8 fold elevation) for lower curvature angle <90° while the changes in stroke propensity by AF are negligible for higher curvature angle >90°. The present simulations suggest that aortic arch curvature is an important risk factor for embolic stroke which should be tested in future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.