Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28765648›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Role of Aortic Geometry on Stroke Propensity based on Simulations of Patient-Specific Models.

Hyo Won Choi, Tong Luo, Jose A Navia, Ghassan S Kassab

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyo Won ChoiThe California Medical Innovations Institute, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Tong LuoThe California Medical Innovations Institute, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Jose A NaviaDepartment of Surgery, Austral University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ghassan S KassabThe California Medical Innovations Institute, San Diego, California, United States of America. gkassab@calmi2.org.
California Medical Innovations Institute · USAustral University · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is a life threatening event that is expected to more than double over the next 40 years. Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported as a strong independent risk factor for stroke. We have previously shown that a hemodynamic perturbation by AF or reduced cardiac output and cycle length may have a significant impact on clot trajectory and thus embolic stroke propensity through the left common carotid artery using an idealized aortic arch model. Here, we show the dependence of flow patterns and hence stroke propensity on geometry of patient-specific aortas. We performed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to determine the variations of AF-induced stroke propensity over various image-based patient-dependent aorta models. The results demonstrated that curvature pattern of aorta can play a determinant role in AF-induced stroke propensity alteration. Specifically, it was shown that the hemodynamic perturbation by AF considered led to substantial increase in stroke propensity (i.e., 2.5~3.8 fold elevation) for lower curvature angle <90° while the changes in stroke propensity by AF are negligible for higher curvature angle >90°. The present simulations suggest that aortic arch curvature is an important risk factor for embolic stroke which should be tested in future clinical trials.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAortaHumansHydrodynamicsRegional Blood FlowRisk AssessmentStroke

Identifiers

PMID28765648
PMCPMC5539283
OpenAlexW2739350288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.