ArticleScientific reports2017
Assessment of imprinting- and genetic variation-dependent monoallelic expression using reciprocal allele descendants between human family trios.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics characterization of RNA modification enzymes identifies NAT10 as a functionally validated prognostic biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Approaches for identification of 5' UTR mutations impacting translation and protein production from neurodevelopmental disorder genes.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- A Massively Parallel Screen of 5'UTR Mutations Identifies Variants Impacting Translation and Protein Production in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Genes.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Nuclear-specific gene expression in heterokaryons of the filamentous ascomyceteProceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Gender-related differentially expressed genes in pancreatic cancer: possible culprits or accomplices?Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Parent-of-origin effects on quantitative phenotypes in a large Hutterite pedigree.Communications biology · 2019Article
- Realizing the significance of noncoding functionality in clinical genomics.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic imprinting is an important epigenetic process that silences one of the parentally-inherited alleles of a gene and thereby exhibits allelic-specific expression (ASE). Detection of human imprinting events is hampered by the infeasibility of the reciprocal mating system in humans and the removal of ASE events arising from non-imprinting factors. Here, we describe a pipeline with the pattern of reciprocal allele descendants (RADs) through genotyping and transcriptome sequencing data across independent parent-offspring trios to discriminate between varied types of ASE (e.g., imprinting, genetic variation-dependent ASE, and random monoallelic expression (RME)). We show that the vast majority of ASE events are due to sequence-dependent genetic variant, which are evolutionarily conserved and may themselves play a cis-regulatory role. Particularly, 74% of non-RAD ASE events, even though they exhibit ASE biases toward the same parentally-inherited allele across different individuals, are derived from genetic variation but not imprinting. We further show that the RME effect may affect the effectiveness of the population-based method for detecting imprinting events and our pipeline can help to distinguish between these two ASE types. Taken together, this study provides a good indicator for categorization of different types of ASE, opening up this widespread and complex mechanism for comprehensive characterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.