Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28765182›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2017

A vulnerable plaque identified on CT coronary angiography: when should we act in stable coronary artery disease?

Sarah R Blake, Thomas D Heseltine, Scott Murray, Balazs Ruzsics

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah R BlakeDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Thomas D HeseltineDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Scott MurrayDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Balazs RuzsicsDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CT coronary angiography (CTCA) is increasingly being used to diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD). Recent technological advancements, including dual energy CT and improved gantry times, have led to the ability to image coronary arteries with excellent spatial resolution at low radiation doses. Atheromatous plaques can be identified using CTCA and assessed to establish the risk of acute coronary syndrome from each individual plaque. If CTCA identifies CAD, it should then be used in conjunction with functional testing or invasive angiography with physiological assessment to establish the significance of coronary disease in an individual patient. In this case, the patient was diagnosed with an acute coronary syndrome originating from an atheromatous plaque that had been identified on CTCA 15 months before the acute event. The patient had positive ischaemic testing on myocardial perfusion scan but no symptoms of angina prior to the acute event. This case highlights the increasing difficulties clinicians face when deciding on management for patients with high-risk plaques, as there are little guidelines beyond aggressive secondary prevention.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseDisease ManagementDisease ProgressionFemaleHeart VentriclesHumansMiddle AgedPlaque, AtheroscleroticTomography, X-Ray ComputedVentricular Function, LeftCardiovascular MedicineInterventional CardiologyRadiology

Identifiers

PMID28765182
PMCPMC5612267
OpenAlexW2740278394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.