Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28765085›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2017

A preregistered, direct replication attempt of the retrieval-extinction effect in cued fear conditioning in rats.

Laura Luyten, Tom Beckers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Restoring prefrontal function with dopaminergic enhancement of memory updating in addiction.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Memory erasure by dopamine-gated retrospective learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Mechanisms of Change in Exposure Therapy for Anxiety and Related Disorders: A Research Agenda.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Reconsolidation and Fear Extinction: An Update.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Locus coeruleus input-modulated reactivation of dentate gyrus opioid-withdrawal engrams promotes extinction.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  16. The elegant complexity of fear in non-human animals.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura LuytenCentre for the Psychology of Learning and Experimental Psychopathology, KU Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: laura.luyten@kuleuven.be.
Tom BeckersCentre for the Psychology of Learning and Experimental Psychopathology, KU Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

European Research Council 648176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2009, Monfils and colleagues proposed a behavioral procedure that was said to result in a permanent attenuation of a previously established fear memory, thereby precluding a possible return of fear after extinction (Monfils, Cowansage, Klann, & LeDoux, 2009). By presenting a single retrieval trial one hour before standard extinction training, they found an enduring reduction of fear. The retrieval-extinction procedure holds great clinical potential, particularly for anxiety patients, but the findings are not undisputed, and several conceptual replications have failed to reproduce the effect. These failures have largely been attributed to small procedural differences. This preregistered study is the first endeavor to exactly replicate three key experiments of the original report by Monfils et al. (2009), thereby gauging the robustness of their seminal findings. Despite adhering to the original procedures as closely as possible, we did not find any evidence for reduced return of fear with the retrieval-extinction procedure relative to regular extinction training, as assessed through spontaneous recovery, reinstatement and renewal. Behavior of animals in the control condition (extinction only) was comparable to that in the original studies and provided an adequate baseline to reveal differences with the retrieval-extinction condition. Our null findings indicate that the effect sizes in the original paper may have been inflated and question the legitimacy of previously proposed moderators of the retrieval-extinction effect. We argue that direct experimental evaluation of purported moderators of the retrieval-extinction effect will be key to shed more light on its nature and prerequisites.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalExtinction, PsychologicalFearMental RecallAnimalsCuesMaleRats, Sprague-DawleyBehavioral updatingCued fear conditioningPost-retrieval amnesiaReconsolidationReplicationRetrieval-extinction

Identifiers

PMID28765085
PMCPMC5931313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.