ArticleBehavioural brain research2018
Prefrontal connections of the perirhinal and postrhinal cortices in the rat.
Article in Behavioural brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adaptive integration of model-based and model-free strategies in human reinforcement learning of reachable space.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The circuitry regulation of associative learning: dissociated and integrated function of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2026Review
- A new map of the rat isocortex and proisocortex: cytoarchitecture and MBrain structure & function · 2024Article
- The anatomy and function of the postrhinal cortex.Behavioral neuroscience · 2022Review
- Dual projecting cells linking thalamic and cortical communication routes between the medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2022Article
- Beyond the hippocampus: The role of parahippocampal-prefrontal communication in context-modulated behavior.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2021Review
- Mouse visual cortex areas represent perceptual and semantic features of learned visual categories.Nature neuroscience · 2021Article
- Article
- Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II in Aging Rat Prefrontal Cortex Impairs Working Memory Performance.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Impaired Parahippocampal Gyrus-Orbitofrontal Cortex Circuit Associated with Visuospatial Memory Deficit as a Potential Biomarker and Interventional Approach for Alzheimer Disease.Neuroscience bulletin · 2020Article
- Age-Related Alterations in Prelimbic Cortical NeuronFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Knowing how prefrontal regions interact with medial temporal lobe structures is important for understanding memory and cognition. Using anterograde and retrograde tract tracing methods in the rat, we report a detailed study of the perirhinal (PER) and postrhinal (POR) connections with the lateral, ventrolateral, and medial orbitofrontal cortices (ORBl, ORBvl, ORBm), infralimbic and prelimbic cortices (IL, PL), ventral and dorsal anterior cingulate cortices (ACAv, ACAd), and secondary motor cortex (MOs). Our analyses included the topography and laminar patterns of these connections. The PER and POR showed reciprocal connectivity with all prefrontal regions examined, but the patterns of connections differed. In general, PER areas 36 and 35 showed patterns of connectivity that were more similar to each other than to those of the POR. Analysis of anterograde tracers showed that PER areas 36 and 35 provide the strongest projections to prefrontal regions. The heaviest fiber labeling was in IL and PL, closely followed by orbital regions. Fiber labeling arising from injections in POR was weaker overall. The strongest POR efferents targeted MOs, ACAv, and ORBvl. For return projections, analysis of retrograde tracers showed that PER areas 36 and 35 receive strong inputs from orbitofrontal and medial prefrontal regions. Interestingly, PER also received substantial inputs from MOs and ACAd. The POR receives a very strong input from MOs, followed by ACAd, and ORBvl. Based on comparison of our findings with those obtained in monkeys, we argue that the rodent ACAd and MOs may be a functional homolog of the primate dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.