Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28765000›Full record

ReviewJournal of chromatography. A2017

Advances in microscale separations towards nanoproteomics applications.

Lian Yi, Paul D Piehowski, Tujin Shi, Richard D Smith, Wei-Jun Qian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chromatography. A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Exploring Single-Cell Exposomics by Mass Spectrometry.Environmental science & technology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Single-Cell Proteomics: The Critical Role of Nanotechnology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Infrared Laser Ablation Microsampling with a Reflective Objective.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Microfluidics for Peptidomics, Proteomics, and Cell Analysis.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. The rise of single-cell proteomics.Analytical science advances · 2021
    Review
  14. Tooth Enamel and its Dynamic Protein Matrix.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Nanoproteomics comes of age.Expert review of proteomics · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lian YiBiological Sciences Division and Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, United States.
Paul D PiehowskiBiological Sciences Division and Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, United States.
Tujin ShiBiological Sciences Division and Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, United States.
Richard D SmithBiological Sciences Division and Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, United States.
Wei-Jun QianBiological Sciences Division and Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, United States. Electronic address: weijun.qian@pnnl.gov.

Funding

Equipment Supplement Request for a Research Resource for Ultra-sensitive High Throughput ProteomicsP41GM103493 · NIGMS · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI SMITH, RICHARD D · 2012 to 2022
$22.6M
Regulatory Networks and Biomarkers of Beta-cell Dysfunction and ApoptosisUC4DK104167 · NIDDK · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI KULKARNI, ROHIT N., MATHEWS, CLAYTON E · 2014 to 2016
$2.7M
Serum protein biomarkers for predicting type 1 diabetesDP3DK110844 · NIDDK · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI QIAN, WEI-JUN · 2016 to 2016
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS DP3 DK110844NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK104167NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscale separation (e.g., liquid chromatography or capillary electrophoresis) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) has become the primary tool for advanced proteomics, an indispensable technology for gaining understanding of complex biological processes. In recent decades significant advances have been achieved in MS-based proteomics. However, the current proteomics platforms still face an analytical challenge in overall sensitivity towards nanoproteomics applications for starting materials of less than 1μg total proteins (e.g., cellular heterogeneity in tissue pathologies). Herein, we review recent advances in microscale separation techniques and integrated sample processing strategies that improve the overall sensitivity and proteome coverage of the proteomics workflow, and their contributions towards nanoproteomics applications.

Indexed as

Chromatography, LiquidElectrophoresis, CapillaryMass SpectrometryProteomeProteomicsProteomeCapillary electrophoresisMass spectrometryMicroscale separationsNanoLCNanoproteomics

Identifiers

PMID28765000
PMCPMC6042839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.