Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28764808›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2017

Association between MPO-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk: evidence from 60 case-control studies.

Wen-Jun Yang, Ming-Yue Wang, Fu-Ze Pan, Chen Shi, Hong Cen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wen-Jun YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Gui Lin, 541100, China.
Ming-Yue WangDepartment of Chemotherapy, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.
Fu-Ze PanDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Chen ShiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Hong CenDepartment of Chemotherapy, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China. hongcen2016@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThough a number of studies have been conducted to explore the association between myeloperoxidase (MPO)-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk, the results remain inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to derive a more systematic estimation of this relationship.

methodRelevant studies were searched by PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, Google Scholar, Ovid, and Cochrane library prior to December 2015. The strength of the association between MPO-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk was estimated by odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Cumulative analysis was used to evaluate the stability of results through time.

resultsThe current analysis consisted of 16,858 cases and 21,756 controls from 60 studies. Pooled results showed that MPO-463G > A polymorphism were associated with the overall decreased cancer susceptibility in all the genetic models included in this study (additive model: OR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.76-0.94; allele genetic model: OR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.840-0.954; recessive genetic model: OR = 0.89, 95%CI = 0.83-0.95). However, in the stratified analysis of cancer type, the significant results were only found in lung cancer (dominant model: OR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.87-0.99) and digestive system cancer groups (dominant model: OR = 0.67 0.53-0.84; allele frequency model = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.57-0.87), but not in the blood system cancer or breast cancer group. When we further stratified the digestive system cancer group into digestive tract and digestive gland cancer groups, results showed a significant association between allele A of MPO-463G > A and digestive gland cancer in all the genetic models (allele frequency model: OR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.40-0.99; additive model: OR = 0.41, 95%CI = 0.23-0.73; recessive model: OR = 0.51, 95%CI = 0.29-0.89; dominant model: OR = 0.58, 95%CI = 0.35-0.96), digestive tract cancers in allele frequency model (OR = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.59-0.95), and dominant model (OR = 0.72, 95%CI = 0.56-0.92). When stratified by ethnicity, results demonstrated that the genotype A might be a protect factor for both Caucasians and Asians. In group analysis according to source of controls, significant results were found in population from hospital in all the genetic models. In cumulative analysis, result of allele contrast showed a declining trend and increasingly narrower 95% overall, while the inclination toward non-significant association with lung cancer risk.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis suggested that MPO-463G > A polymorphism was associated with the overall reduced cancer susceptibility significantly. It might be a more reliable predictor of digestive system cancer instead of lung cancer, blood system cancer, and breast cancer. In cumulative analysis, the stable trend indicated that evidence was sufficient to show the association between MPO-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdenineAsian PeopleGene FrequencyGenotypeGuanineHumansNeoplasmsOdds RatioPeroxidasePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrognosisRisk FactorsWhite PeopleAdenineGuaninePeroxidaseCancerGene polymorphismMeta-analysisMyeloperoxidase

Identifiers

PMID28764808
PMCPMC5539634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.