Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28764752›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2017

Facilitated interprofessional implementation of a physical rehabilitation guideline for stroke in inpatient settings: process evaluation of a cluster randomized trial.

Nancy M Salbach, Sharon Wood-Dauphinee, Johanne Desrosiers, Janice J Eng, Ian D Graham, Susan B Jaglal, Nicol Korner-Bitensky, Marilyn MacKay-Lyons, Nancy E Mayo, Carol L Richards and 4 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00359593 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Stroke Canada Optimization of Rehabilitation by Evidence Implementation Trial (SCORE IT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorToronto Rehabilitation InstituteRan2006 to 2008Enrolled2,000ConditionsStrokeArmsKnowledge translation intervention package
NCT03448159 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

FLOW Trial: Fluoxetine to Open the Critical Period Time Window to Improve Motor Recovery After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2019 to 2022Enrolled52ConditionsStroke, Cerebrovascular Accident, Cerebral Infarction, Brain InfarctionArmsFluoxetine Hydrochloride, Placebo, Exercise Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy M SalbachDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada. nancy.salbach@utoronto.ca.
Sharon Wood-DauphineeSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3630 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y5, Canada.
Johanne DesrosiersFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e avenue nord, Bureau FM-2208, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada.
Janice J EngUniversity of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Ian D GrahamSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Cres, Ottawa, K1G 5Z3, Canada.
Susan B JaglalDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada.
Nicol Korner-BitenskySchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3630 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y5, Canada.
Marilyn MacKay-LyonsSchool of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Office 405 Forrest Building, 5869 University Avenue, PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Nancy E MayoDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Division of Geriatrics, McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital Site, Ross Pavilion R4.29, 687 Pine Ave W, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A1, Canada.
Carol L RichardsDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval and Centre de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CIRRIS), Institut de réadaptation en déficience physique de Québec (IRDPQ) Site Hamel, 525 Boul. Wilfrid-Hamel Est, Québec, QC, G1M 2S8, Canada.
Robert W TeasellParkwood Institute, 550 Wellington Road, London, ON, N6C 0A7, Canada.
Merrick ZwarensteinSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada.
Mark T BayleyToronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, room 3-131 (3-East) 3rd Floor University Wing, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada.
Stroke Canada Optimization of Rehabilitation By Evidence – Implementation Trial (SCORE-IT) Team
University Health Network · CADalhousie University · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAWestern University · CAParkwood Institute · CARoyal Victoria Regional Health Centre · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR FDN #143237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Stroke Canada Optimization of Rehabilitation by Evidence-Implementation Trial (SCORE-IT) showed that a facilitated knowledge translation (KT) approach to implementing a stroke rehabilitation guideline was more likely than passive strategies to improve functional walking capacity, but not gross manual dexterity, among patients in rehabilitation hospitals. This paper presents the results of a planned process evaluation designed to assess whether the type and number of recommended treatments implemented by stroke teams in each group would help to explain the results related to patient outcomes.

methodsAs part of a cluster randomized trial, 20 rehabilitation units were stratified by language and allocated to a facilitated or passive KT intervention group. Sites in the facilitated group received the guideline with treatment protocols and funding for a part-time nurse and therapist facilitator who attended a 2-day training workshop and promoted guideline implementation for 16 months. Sites in the passive group received the guideline excluding treatment protocols. As part of a process evaluation, nurses, and occupational and physical therapists, blinded to study hypotheses, were asked to record their implementation of 18 recommended treatments targeting motor function, postural control and mobility using individualized patient checklists after treatment sessions for 2 weeks pre- and post-intervention. The percentage of patients receiving each treatment pre- and post-intervention and between groups was compared after adjusting for clustering and covariates in a random-effects logistic regression analysis.

resultsData on treatment implementation from nine and eight sites in the facilitated and passive KT group, respectively, were available for analysis. The facilitated KT intervention was associated with improved implementation of sit-to-stand (p = 0.028) and walking (p = 0.043) training while the passive KT intervention was associated with improved implementation of standing balance training (p = 0.037), after adjusting for clustering at patient and provider levels and covariates.

conclusionsDespite multiple strategies and resources, the facilitated KT intervention was unsuccessful in improving integration of 18 treatments concurrently. The facilitated approach may not have adequately addressed barriers to integrating numerous treatments simultaneously and complex treatments that were unfamiliar to providers.

trial registrationUnique identifier- NCT00359593.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsPractice Guidelines as TopicAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaExercise TherapyFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamStroke RehabilitationCluster randomizationFacilitationGuidelineImplementationInterprofessionalKnowledge translationProcess evaluationRandomized controlled trialRehabilitationStroke

Identifiers

PMID28764752
PMCPMC5539742
OpenAlexW2739942871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.