Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28764555›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2017

Repeated measures dose-finding design with time-trend detection in the presence of correlated toxicity data.

Jun Yin, Xavier Paoletti, Daniel J Sargent, Sumithra J Mandrekar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. A Road Map for Designing Phase I Clinical Trials of Radiotherapy-Novel Agent Combinations.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun Yin1 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Xavier Paoletti2 Biostatistics and Epidemiology Department, INSERM CESP, OncoStat, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Daniel J Sargent1 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sumithra J Mandrekar1 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

Methodology for development, validation, and use of novel endpoints in oncologyR01CA174779 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MANDREKAR, SUMITHRA JAY · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhase I trials are designed to determine the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose of therapeutic agents for subsequent testing. The dose-finding paradigm has thus traditionally focused on identifying the maximum tolerable dose of an agent or combination therapy under the assumption that there is a non-decreasing relationship between dose-toxicity and dose-efficacy. The dose is typically determined based on the probability of severe toxicity observed during the first treatment cycle. A novel endpoint, the total toxicity profile, was previously developed to account for the multiple toxicity types and grades experienced in the first cycle. More recently, this was extended to a repeated measures design based on the total toxicity profile to account for longitudinal toxicities over multiple treatment cycles in the absence of within-patient correlation.

methodsIn this work, we propose to extend the design in the presence of within-patient correlation. Furthermore, we provide a framework to detect a toxicity time trend (toxicity increasing, decreasing, or stable) over multiple treatment cycles. We utilize a linear mixed model in the Bayesian framework, with the addition of Bayesian risk functions for decision-making in dose assignment.

resultsThe performance of this design was evaluated using simulation studies and real data from a phase I trial. We demonstrated that using available toxicity data from all cycles of treatment improves the accuracy of maximum tolerated dose identification and allows for the detection of a time trend. The performance is consistent regardless of the strength of the within-patient correlation. In addition, the use of a quasi-continuous total toxicity profile score significantly increased the power to detect time trends compared to when binary data only were used.

conclusionThe increased interest in molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies in oncology necessitates innovative phase I study designs. Our proposed framework provides a tool to tackle some of the challenges presented by these novel agents, specifically through the ability to understand patterns of toxicity over time, which is important in the cases of cumulative or late toxicities.

Indexed as

Maximum Tolerated DoseAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic AgentsBayes TheoremClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicDepsipeptidesDose-Response Relationship, DrugEndpoint DeterminationHumansImmunotherapyLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic AgentsDepsipeptidesromidepsinadaptivecontinual reassessment methodcorrelated toxicityDose-findingimmunotherapymaximum tolerated dosemolecularly targeted agentsphase I clinical trialsrepeated measurestime trend

Identifiers

PMID28764555
PMCPMC5714674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.