Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28764278›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2017

Comparison of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Immunohistochemistry Assays for Analysing Human Papillomavirus Infection in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Muhammad Sohail Awan, Babar Irfan, Ibrahim Zahid, Yumna Mirza, Syed Adnan Ali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muhammad Sohail AwanAssociate Professor, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Babar IrfanStudent, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ibrahim ZahidStudent, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Yumna MirzaResearch Associate, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Syed Adnan AliAssistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aga Khan University Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPolymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) are two well-known techniques used for the diagnoses of genetic diseases, tumours and different pathogens. PCR basically amplify regions of DNA within a single molecule which may have etiologic significance, it is a method for in vitro amplification of specific DNA or RNA sequences, whereas IHC is used to verify tissue constituents (the antigens) with the utilization of specific antibodies that can be visualized through staining.

aimTo compare and analyse PCR and IHC for their sensitivity to detect Human Papillomavirus (HPV) in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study was based on samples retrospectively collected from 47 patients with primary OSCC who were diagnosed and treated at The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, during the period of January 2010 to December 2013. Inclusion criteria were complete clinicopathologic data, adequate clinical follow up and availability of sufficient paraffin- embedded tumour material. HPV general and type specific 16 and 18 were investigated by means of PCR. HPV immunoreactivity was further investigated by means of IHC.

resultsAmong the 47 evaluated patients, 32 (68.1%) were male and 15 (31.9%) were female, PCR detected the presence of HPV in 32 (68.1%) patients while IHC showed no positive test results. p53 was positive in 32 (68.1%) patients and negative in 15 (31.9%). HPV type 16 being most prevalent showing positivity in 27 (57.4%) patients whereas, type 18 was positive in only 1 (2.1%) patient.

conclusionWe concluded that PCR is more sensitive and reliable when diagnosing and detecting HPV for OSCC rather than IHC as results from IHC were all negative and insignificant, hence PCR should be the first initial diagnostic test for detecting HPV due to its better sensitivity and successful detection of HPV.

Indexed as

CancerSensitivityTechnique

Identifiers

PMID28764278
PMCPMC5535468
OpenAlexW2735151432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.