Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28764206›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2017

Analysis of Survival Data: Challenges and Algorithm-Based Model Selection.

Kaushik Sarkar, Ranadip Chowdhury, Aparajita Dasgupta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaushik SarkarJunior Resident, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Kolkata, India.
Ranadip ChowdhuryIndependent Researcher, New Delhi, India.
Aparajita DasguptaHead, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Kolkata, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival data is a special form of time to event data that is often encountered while modelling risk. The classical Cox proportional hazard model, that is popularly used to analyse survival data, cannot be used for modelling risk when the proportional hazard assumption is violated or when there is recurrent time to event data. In this context we conducted this narrative review to develop an algorithm for selection of advanced methods of analysing survival data in the above-mentioned situations. Findings were synthesized from literature retrieved from searches of Pubmed, Embase, and Google Scholar. Existing literature suggest that for non-proportionality, especially due to categorical predictors stratified Cox model may be useful. An accelerated failure time model is applicable in case of different follow-up time among different experimental groups and the median time to event is the outcome of interest instead of hazard. Extended Cox models and marginal models are used in case of multivariate ordered failure events and the type of model depends upon the presence of clustering and nature of ordering. In the presence of heterogeneity, a shared frailty model is used that is analogous to mixed models. More advanced models, including competing risk and multistate models are required for modelling competing risk, multiple states and multiple transitions. Joint models are used for multiple time dependent outcomes with different attributes. We have developed an algorithm based on the review for appropriate model selection to curb the challenge of modeling survival data and the algorithm is expected to help the naïve researchers in analysing survival data.

Indexed as

Accelerated failure timeExtended cox modelsFrailty modelsMultistate modelsTime to event data

Identifiers

PMID28764206
PMCPMC5532537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.