Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28763549›Full record

Observational studyJAMA2017

Association of Practice-Level Social and Medical Risk With Performance in the Medicare Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier Program.

Lena M Chen, Arnold M Epstein, E John Orav, Clara E Filice, Lok Wong Samson, Karen E Joynt Maddox

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Association of Insurance Type With Colorectal Surgery Outcomes and Costs at a Safety-Net Hospital: A Retrospective Observational Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lena M ChenDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor2Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor3Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor4Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
Arnold M EpsteinDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts6Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
E John OravDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts6Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Clara E FiliceAtrius Health, Newton, Massachusetts8Now with Commonwealth Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Shrewsbury.
Lok Wong SamsonOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
Karen E Joynt MaddoxOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC5Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts6Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts9Now with Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.

Funding

UNDERSTANDING AND IMPROVING EPISODE-BASED HOSPITAL CAREP01AG019783 · NIA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Alistair James O'MALLEY · 2001 to 2026
$52.9M
Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Effects of accountable care organizations on post-acute careR01HS024698 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BYNUM, JULIE PW · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
THE IMPACT OF PUBLIC REPORTING ON OUTCOMES AND CASE SELECTION FOR PCIK23HL109177 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOYNT MADDOX, KAREN ELLEN · 2011 to 2017
$691k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024698NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL109177NIA NIH HHS P01 AG019783NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Medicare recently launched the Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier (PVBM) Program, a mandatory pay-for-performance program for physician practices. Little is known about performance by practices that serve socially or medically high-risk patients. Objective: To compare performance in the PVBM Program by practice characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional observational study using PVBM Program data for payments made in 2015 based on performance of large US physician practices caring for fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2013. Exposures: High social risk (defined as practices in the top quartile of proportion of patients dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid) and high medical risk (defined as practices in the top quartile of mean Hierarchical Condition Category risk score among fee-for-service beneficiaries). Main Outcomes and Measures: Quality and cost z scores based on a composite of individual measures. Higher z scores reflect better performance on quality; lower scores, better performance on costs. Results: Among 899 physician practices with 5 189 880 beneficiaries, 547 practices were categorized as low risk (neither high social nor high medical risk) (mean, 7909 beneficiaries; mean, 320 clinicians), 128 were high medical risk only (mean, 3675 beneficiaries; mean, 370 clinicians), 102 were high social risk only (mean, 1635 beneficiaries; mean, 284 clinicians), and 122 were high medical and social risk (mean, 1858 beneficiaries; mean, 269 clinicians). Practices categorized as low risk performed the best on the composite quality score (z score, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.28]) compared with each of the practices categorized as high risk (high medical risk only: z score, -0.55 [95% CI, -0.77 to -0.32]; high social risk only: z score, -0.86 [95% CI, -1.17 to -0.54]; and high medical and social risk: -0.78 [95% CI, -1.04 to -0.51]) (P < .001 across groups). Practices categorized as high social risk only performed the best on the composite cost score (z score, -0.52 [95% CI, -0.71 to -0.33]), low risk had the next best cost score (z score, -0.18 [95% CI, -0.25 to -0.10]), then high medical and social risk (z score, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.57]), and then high medical risk only (z score, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.99]) (P < .001 across groups). Total per capita costs were $9506 for practices categorized as low risk, $13 683 for high medical risk only, $8214 for high social risk only, and $11 692 for high medical and social risk. These patterns were associated with fewer bonuses and more penalties for high-risk practices. Conclusions and Relevance: During the first year of the Medicare Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier Program, physician practices that served more socially high-risk patients had lower quality and lower costs, and practices that served more medically high-risk patients had lower quality and higher costs.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareReimbursement, IncentiveCross-Sectional StudiesFee-for-Service PlansHealth Care CostsHealth StatusHumansMedicaidPhysiciansProfessional PracticeRiskSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28763549
PMCPMC5817610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.