Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28763051›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

The ancestral flower of angiosperms and its early diversification.

Hervé Sauquet, Maria von Balthazar, Susana Magallón, James A Doyle, Peter K Endress, Emily J Bailes, Erica Barroso de Morais, Kester Bull-Hereñu, Laetitia Carrive, Marion Chartier and 26 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Loss, persistence and reversal of phenotypic traits.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Reversibility of sex changes in the plant kingdom: more important than we thought?Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  18. General laws of biodiversity: Climatic niches predict plant range size and ecological dominance globally.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Hervé SauquetLaboratoire Écologie, Systématique, Évolution, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS UMR 8079, Orsay 91405, France.
Maria von BalthazarDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna 1030, Austria.
Susana MagallónInstituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, México City 04510, México.
James A DoyleDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA.
Peter K EndressDepartment of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich 8008, Switzerland.
Emily J BailesSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.
Erica Barroso de MoraisDepartment of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich 8008, Switzerland.
Kester Bull-HereñuDepartamento de Ecología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Alameda 340, Santiago, Chile.
Laetitia CarriveLaboratoire Écologie, Systématique, Évolution, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS UMR 8079, Orsay 91405, France.
Marion ChartierDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna 1030, Austria.
Guillaume ChomickiSystematic Botany and Mycology, Department of Biology, University of Munich LMU, Munich 80638, Germany.
Mario CoiroDepartment of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich 8008, Switzerland.
Raphaël CornetteInstitut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7205 ISYEB MNHN/CNRS/UPMC/EPHE, 57 rue Cuvier, CP39, Paris 75005, France.
Juliana H L El OttraLaboratório de Sistemática Vegetal, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, 277. Cidade Universitária, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.
Cyril EpicocoLaboratoire Écologie, Systématique, Évolution, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS UMR 8079, Orsay 91405, France.
Charles S P FosterSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Florian JabbourInstitut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7205 ISYEB MNHN/CNRS/UPMC/EPHE, 57 rue Cuvier, CP39, Paris 75005, France.
Agathe HaevermansInstitut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7205 ISYEB MNHN/CNRS/UPMC/EPHE, 57 rue Cuvier, CP39, Paris 75005, France.
Thomas HaevermansInstitut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7205 ISYEB MNHN/CNRS/UPMC/EPHE, 57 rue Cuvier, CP39, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8934-4544
Rebeca HernándezInstituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, México City 04510, México.
Stefan A LittleLaboratoire Écologie, Systématique, Évolution, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS UMR 8079, Orsay 91405, France.
Stefan LöfstrandDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna 1030, Austria.
Javier A LunaRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, UK.
Julien MassoniInstitute of Microbiology, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8093, Switzerland.
Sophie NadotLaboratoire Écologie, Systématique, Évolution, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS UMR 8079, Orsay 91405, France.
Susanne PamperlDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna 1030, Austria.
Charlotte PrieuLaboratoire Écologie, Systématique, Évolution, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS UMR 8079, Orsay 91405, France.
Elisabeth ReyesLaboratoire Écologie, Systématique, Évolution, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS UMR 8079, Orsay 91405, France.
Patrícia Dos SantosCentre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa 1749-016, Portugal.
Kristel M SchoonderwoerdOrganismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9753-2537
Susanne SontagDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna 1030, Austria.
Anaëlle SoulebeauInstitut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7205 ISYEB MNHN/CNRS/UPMC/EPHE, 57 rue Cuvier, CP39, Paris 75005, France.
Yannick StaedlerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna 1030, Austria.
Georg F TschanDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Carl Skottsbergs gata 22B, Göteborg 413 19, Sweden.
Amy Wing-Sze LeungSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China.
Jürg SchönenbergerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna 1030, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 25077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in molecular phylogenetics and a series of important palaeobotanical discoveries have revolutionized our understanding of angiosperm diversification. Yet, the origin and early evolution of their most characteristic feature, the flower, remains poorly understood. In particular, the structure of the ancestral flower of all living angiosperms is still uncertain. Here we report model-based reconstructions for ancestral flowers at the deepest nodes in the phylogeny of angiosperms, using the largest data set of floral traits ever assembled. We reconstruct the ancestral angiosperm flower as bisexual and radially symmetric, with more than two whorls of three separate perianth organs each (undifferentiated tepals), more than two whorls of three separate stamens each, and more than five spirally arranged separate carpels. Although uncertainty remains for some of the characters, our reconstruction allows us to propose a new plausible scenario for the early diversification of flowers, leading to new testable hypotheses for future research on angiosperms.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionFlowersMagnoliopsidaPhenotypePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID28763051
PMCPMC5543309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.