Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28763021›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2017

A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye.

Lara S Franco, Danielle F Shanahan, Richard A Fuller

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 387 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Inequalities in noise will affect urban wildlife.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Biophilic Experience-Based Residential Hybrid Framework.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Testing a New Protocol of Nature-Based Intervention to Enhance Well-Being: A Randomized Control Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  12. The Mood-Improving Effect of Viewing Images of Nature and Its Neural Substrate.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  13. Walking Green: Developing an Evidence Base for Nature Prescriptions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Trial
  14. The forest as a health-promoting place-the meaning for seniors of playing padel in the forest: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lara S FrancoSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. L.Franco@uq.edu.au.
Danielle F ShanahanZealandia Sanctuary, 31 Waiapu Road, Karori, Wellington 6012, New Zealand. R.fuller@uq.edu.au.
Richard A FullerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. Danielle.shanahan@visitzealandia.com.
The University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence that experiences of nature can benefit people has accumulated rapidly. Yet perhaps because of the domination of the visual sense in humans, most research has focused on the visual aspects of nature experiences. However, humans are multisensory, and it seems likely that many benefits are delivered through the non-visual senses and these are potentially avenues through which a physiological mechanism could occur. Here we review the evidence around these lesser studied sensory pathways-through sound, smell, taste, touch, and three non-sensory pathways. Natural sounds and smells underpin experiences of nature for many people, and this may well be rooted in evolutionary psychology. Tactile experiences of nature, particularly beyond animal petting, are understudied yet potentially fundamentally important. Tastes of nature, through growing and consuming natural foods, have been linked with a range of health and well-being benefits. Beyond the five senses, evidence is emerging for other non-visual pathways for nature experiences to be effective. These include ingestion or inhalation of phytoncides, negative air ions and microbes. We conclude that (i) these non-visual avenues are potentially important for delivering benefits from nature experiences; (ii) the evidence base is relatively weak and often based on correlational studies; and (iii) deeper exploration of these sensory and non-sensory avenues is needed.

Indexed as

NatureSensationAnimalsHumansnature benefitsnature experiencenature therapysensorywellbeing

Identifiers

PMID28763021
PMCPMC5580568
OpenAlexW2739613847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.