Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28762987›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2017

Autoreactive T cells in type 1 diabetes.

Alberto Pugliese

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 223 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
223citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

223 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cross-presentation of citrullinated antigens drives cytotoxic CD8bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Antigen-specific immunotherapy with a CD4Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. PANoptosis in diabetes: immunometabolic insights and treatments.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Type 1 diabetesNPJ autoimmunity · 2026
    Article

163 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alberto Pugliese

Funding

Recurrence of T1D in Pancreas TransplantationR01DK070011 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BURKE, GEORGE WILLIAM · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK070011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic autoimmune disease that causes severe loss of pancreatic β cells. Autoreactive T cells are key mediators of β cell destruction. Studies of organ donors with T1D that have examined T cells in pancreas, the diabetogenic insulitis lesion, and lymphoid tissues have revealed a broad repertoire of target antigens and T cell receptor (TCR) usage, with initial evidence of public TCR sequences that are shared by individuals with T1D. Neoepitopes derived from post-translational modifications of native antigens are emerging as novel targets that are more likely to evade self-tolerance. Further studies will determine whether T cell responses to neoepitopes are major disease drivers that could impact prediction, prevention, and therapy. This Review provides an overview of recent progress in our knowledge of autoreactive T cells that has emerged from experimental and clinical research as well as pathology investigations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigensAutoantigensAutoimmunityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1EpitopesHumansImmune ToleranceInsulin-Secreting CellsIslets of LangerhansMiceMice, Inbred NODPancreasProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesAntigensAutoantigensEpitopesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID28762987
PMCPMC5531393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.