Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28762756›Full record

Trial reportBrain connectivity2017

Intranasal Oxytocin Selectively Modulates Large-Scale Brain Networks in Humans.

Katja Brodmann, Oliver Gruber, Roberto Goya-Maldonado

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain connectivity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. How does oxytocin modulate human behavior?Molecular psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katja Brodmann1 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Translational Research in Systems Neuroscience and Psychiatry, University Medical Center , Göttingen, Germany .
Oliver Gruber1 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Translational Research in Systems Neuroscience and Psychiatry, University Medical Center , Göttingen, Germany .
Roberto Goya-Maldonado1 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Translational Research in Systems Neuroscience and Psychiatry, University Medical Center , Göttingen, Germany .
Heidelberg University · DEInstituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of evidence indicates that the neuropeptide oxytocin (OT) alters the neural correlates of socioemotional and salience processing. Yet the effects of OT over important large-scale networks involved in these processes, such as the default mode (DM), ventral attention (VA), and cingulo-opercular (CO) networks, remain unknown. Therefore, we conducted a placebo-controlled crossover study with intranasal 24 IU OT in 38 healthy male subjects using a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging paradigm to investigate its impact over these three networks candidates. To understand the underlying mechanisms of the neuropeptide, we compared the intranetwork connectivity for each network candidate and also the internetwork connectivity across all networks between both treatment conditions. Based on the relevance of interindividual factors for OT effects, we correlated individual network changes with behavioral performance in a decision-making task and with impulsivity scores. Our results show that OT mainly alters connectivity in the VA, on one side reducing the coupling to regions that typically form the nodes of DM, an introspective and self-referential network, and on the other side increasing the coupling to the edges of the CO, which is involved in salience processing. The results of the internetwork analyses confirmed the specificity of the OT effects. Indeed, we observed significant correlations with the erroneous performance during decision-making but not with the obtained impulsivity scores. Overall, our data support that the modulation of functional connectivity within the VA is a basic mechanism by which OT directs attentional resources from internal to external cues, preparing the brain for context-dependent salience processing.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAdultAttentionBrainBrain MappingCognitionCross-Over StudiesDecision MakingDouble-Blind MethodHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImpulsive BehaviorMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetNeuropsychological TestsOxytocinattentionfMRIfunctional connectivitylarge-scale brain networksoxytocinsalience

Identifiers

PMID28762756
PMCPMC5647506
OpenAlexW2742033165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.