Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28762577›Full record

ArticlePediatric transplantation2017

Assessing barriers to adherence in routine clinical care for pediatric kidney transplant patients.

Charles D Varnell, Kristin L Rich, Melissa Nichols, Devesh Dahale, Jens W Goebel, Ahna L H Pai, David K Hooper, Avani C Modi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Adherence Promotion Strategies to Improve Rejection Rates in Adolescent Kidney Transplant Recipients.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charles D VarnellDivision of Nephrology & Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0409-3799
Kristin L RichDivision of Behavioral and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Melissa NicholsDivision of Nephrology & Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Devesh DahaleJames M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jens W GoebelDivision of Nephrology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Ahna L H PaiDivision of Behavioral and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
David K HooperDivision of Nephrology & Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Avani C ModiDivision of Behavioral and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGYT32DK007695 · NIDDK · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI DEVARAJAN, PRASAD · 1992 to 2023
$2.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-identified barriers to immunosuppressive medications are associated with poor adherence and negative clinical outcomes in transplant patients. Assessment of adherence barriers is not part of routine post-transplant care, and studies regarding implementing such a process in a reliable way are lacking. Using the Model for Improvement and PDSA cycles, we implemented a system to identify adherence barriers, including patient-centered design of a barriers assessment tool, identification of eligible patients, clear roles for clinic staff, and creating a culture of non-judgmental discussion around adherence. We performed time-series analysis of our process measure. Secondary analyses examined the endorsement and concordance of adherence barriers between patient-caregiver dyads. After three methods of testing, the most reliable delivery system was an EHR-integrated tablet that alerted staff of patient eligibility for assessment. Barriers were endorsed by 35% of caregivers (n=85) and 43% of patients (n=60). The most frequently patient-endorsed barriers were forgetting, poor taste, and side effects. Caregivers endorsed forgetting and side effects. Concordance between patient-caregiver dyads was fair (k=0.299). Standardized adherence barriers assessment is feasible in the clinical care of pediatric kidney transplant patients. Features necessary for success included automation, redundant systems with designated staff to identify and mitigate failures, aligned reporting structures, and reliable measurement approaches. Future studies will examine whether barriers predict clinical outcomes (eg, organ rejection, graft loss).

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAdolescentAftercareChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInfantMaleMedication AdherenceOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient-Centered CareProfessional-Patient RelationsQuality ImprovementImmunosuppressive Agentschildnephrologypatient compliancequality improvementtransplants

Identifiers

PMID28762577
PMCPMC5904833
OpenAlexW2739745109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.