Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28762179›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2018

Vaginal laxity: what does this symptom mean?

Hans Peter Dietz, Martyna Stankiewicz, Ixora Kamisan Atan, Caroline Wanderley Ferreira, Maciej Socha

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Prevalence of vaginal laxity in primiparous women six months after birth.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Joint Report on Terminology for Cosmetic Gynecology.International urogynecology journal · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Hans Peter DietzSydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, The University of Sydney, Penrith, Sydney, NSW, 2750, Australia. hpdietz@bigpond.com.
Martyna StankiewiczSydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, The University of Sydney, Penrith, Sydney, NSW, 2750, Australia.
Ixora Kamisan AtanSydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, The University of Sydney, Penrith, Sydney, NSW, 2750, Australia.
Caroline Wanderley FerreiraSydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, The University of Sydney, Penrith, Sydney, NSW, 2750, Australia.
Maciej SochaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Oncological Gynecology, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland.
University of Sydney · AUCollegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz · PLNepean Hospital · AUUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisVaginal laxity is a poorly understood symptom of pelvic floor dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between the symptom of vaginal laxity and its bother on the one hand, and demographic data, other symptoms, and findings on examination on the other hand.

methodsThis was a retrospective observational study at a tertiary urogynecological unit. A total of 337 patients were seen for a standardized interview, clinical examination (ICS POP-Q) and 4D translabial ultrasonography. Stored imaging data were analyzed offline to evaluate functional pelvic floor anatomy and investigate associations with symptoms and other findings.

resultsOf the 337 women seen during the study period, 13 were excluded due to missing data, leaving 324. Vaginal laxity was reported by 24% with a mean bother of 5.7. In a univariate analysis, this symptom was associated with younger age, vaginal parity, POP symptoms and bother, clinically and sonographically determined POP and hiatal area on Valsalva maneuver.

conclusionsVaginal laxity or 'looseness' is common in our urogynecology service at a prevalence of 24%. The associated bother is almost as high as the bother associated with conventional prolapse symptoms. It is associated with younger age, vaginal parity, symptoms of prolapse, prolapse bother and objective prolapse on POP-Q examination and imaging, suggesting that vaginal laxity may be considered a symptom of prolapse. The strongest associations were found with gh + pb and hiatal area on Valsalva maneuver, suggesting that vaginal laxity is a manifestation of levator ani hyperdistensibility.

Indexed as

AustriaFemaleHumansMalePelvic FloorPelvic Organ ProlapsePregnancyRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyVagina3D ultrasonographyPelvic floor ultrasonographyPelvic organ prolapseVaginal laxityVaginal looseness

Identifiers

PMID28762179
OpenAlexW2739568447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.