Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28762140›Full record

Trial reportIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2017

The use of a transparent cap in sigmoidoscopy-A randomized controlled clinical trial on pain, time and success rate.

Magnus Ploug, Jacob Kvist Poulsen, Henning Quist Jensen, Michael Achiam

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02243930 (Cap-assisted Sigmoidoscopy - Reduction in Pain, Reduction in Investigation Time and Increased Rate of Success, When Examined by the Less-experienced Endoscopist. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02243930 nacompletednot on this map

Cap-assisted Sigmoidoscopy - Reduction in Pain, Reduction in Investigation Time and Increased Rate of Success, When Examined by the Less-experienced Endoscopist. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZealand University HospitalRan2014 to 2014Enrolled193ConditionsPainArmsDisposable distal attachment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Magnus PlougDepartment of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde and Koege, Denmark. Magnus.Ploug@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4229-3994
Jacob Kvist PoulsenDepartment of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde and Koege, Denmark.
Henning Quist JensenDepartment of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde and Koege, Denmark.
Michael AchiamDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DKRoskilde Sygehus · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trials on cap-assisted colonoscopy have shown a reduction in pain, faster intubation time and a higher success rate attributed to the use of the cap. No similar studies have been published on sigmoidoscopy even though it is a common procedure associated with significant pain. Our objective was to investigate whether the use of a transparent cap for sigmoidoscopy has an impact on pain, time or success rate. To mimic the tendencies of daily clinical practice, the trainee endoscopist performed the procedures, and no analgesics or sedatives were used. We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial with a parallel design consisting of two groups masked for the intervention. The primary endpoint was pain, recorded on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Our results found cap-assisted sigmoidoscopy to be significantly more painful than non-cap-assisted sigmoidoscopy (median VAS 50 vs. 38 mm; p = 0.047). We found no differences on time or success rate due to the cap. Our results suggest pain management, e.g. analgesics which is not routinely used for sigmoidoscopy, when a cap is used to gain therapeutic or diagnostic advantages. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02243930.

Indexed as

Operative TimeFemaleHumansMalePainPain ManagementPain MeasurementSigmoidoscopyCapColonoscopyPainSigmoidoscopyVisual analogue scale

Identifiers

PMID28762140
OpenAlexW2739601304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.