Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28762126›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2017

Systematic scoping review of patients' perceived needs of health services for osteoporosis.

L Chou, P Shamdasani, A M Briggs, F M Cicuttini, K Sullivan, K L M D Seneviwickrama, A E Wluka

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Metasynthesis of Patient Attitudes Toward Bone Densitometry.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. OsteoCHAT: real-world patient evaluation and benchmarking of a guideline-grounded osteoporosis chatbot.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L ChouDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
P ShamdasaniDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
A M BriggsSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
F M CicuttiniDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
K SullivanMonash University Library, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
K L M D SeneviwickramaDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
A E WlukaDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. anita.wluka@monash.edu.
Monash University · AUCurtin University · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1063574National Health and Medical Research Council #1132548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health service planners, administrators and providers need to understand the patients' perspective of health services related to osteoporosis to optimise health outcomes. The aims of this study were to systematically identify and review the literature regarding patients' perceived health service needs relating to osteoporosis and osteopenia. A systematic scoping review was performed of publications in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO (1990-2016). Descriptive data regarding study design and methodology were extracted and risk of bias assessed. Aggregates of patients' perceived needs of osteoporosis health services were categorised. Thirty-three studies (19 quantitative and 14 qualitative) from 1027 were relevant. The following areas of perceived need emerged: (1) patients sought healthcare from doctors to obtain information and initiate management. They were dissatisfied with poor communication, lack of time and poor continuity of care. (2) Patients perceived a role for osteoporosis pharmacotherapy but were concerned about medication administration and adverse effects. (3) Patients believed that exercise and vitamin supplementation were important, but there is a lack of data examining the needs for other non-pharmacological measures such as smoking cessation and alcohol. (4) Patients wanted diagnostic evaluation and ongoing surveillance of their bone health. This review identified patients' needs for better communication with their healthcare providers. It also showed that a number of important cornerstones of therapy for osteoporosis, such as pharmacotherapy and exercise, are identified as important by patients, as well as ongoing surveillance of bone health. Understanding patients' perceived needs and aligning them with responsive and evidence-informed service models are likely to optimise patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthNeeds AssessmentBone Density Conservation AgentsCommunicationDelivery of Health CareHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansOsteoporosisBone Density Conservation AgentsNeeds assessment of health servicesOsteoporosisPatients

Identifiers

PMID28762126
OpenAlexW2739960207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.