Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28762116›Full record

ReviewAnnals of surgical oncology2017

Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Recommendations for Diagnostics and Treatment.

Urs Dietmar Achim Müller-Richter, Anja Gesierich, Alexander Christian Kübler, Stefan Hartmann, Roman Camillus Brands

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of surgical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cutaneous Metastase of Rectal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Revealed onMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Merkel Cells: A Collective Review of Current Concepts.International journal of applied & basic medical research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Urs Dietmar Achim Müller-RichterDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Würzburg University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany. mueller_u2@ukw.de.
Anja GesierichDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Würzburg University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany.
Alexander Christian KüblerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Würzburg University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany.
Stefan HartmannDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Würzburg University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany.
Roman Camillus BrandsDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Würzburg University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive tumor that often occurs in the head and neck region. Because of these features, the classifications and diagnostic and treatment regimens are frequently modified. Especially in the anatomically complex head and neck region, it is crucial to be aware of the current recommendations for diagnostics and treatment of MCC to ensure appropriate treatment. This overview aims to summarize the currently available literature.

methodsThe authors reviewed the relevant literature and international guidelines for MCC from 2012 to 2017 with respect to epidemiology and prognosis, diagnostic procedures and imaging, surgery, radiation, systemic treatment, and aftercare. These results were compared with existing guidelines, some of them current, and recommendations were derived.

resultsMarked developments in imaging have resulted in an increased use of functional imaging. The surgical concepts have changed regarding safety margins and the use of sentinel node biopsies. In systemic treatment, a move from conventional agents toward immuno-oncology can be observed.

conclusionsFor staging, it is important to be as exact as possible using functional imaging (e.g., positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan), especially in the head and neck area with its complex lymph drainage. This often plays an especially important role in early stages of the tumor, when the resection margin can be reduced to preserve the organ. Aftercare also should include functional imaging. In an advanced, metastatic stage, immuno-oncology (PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4) is superior to the previous methods of systemic treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Merkel CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID28762116
PMCPMC5596053
OpenAlexW2739492804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.