Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28762072›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2017

Sweet taste liking is associated with subjective response to amphetamine in women but not men.

Jessica Weafer, Nicholas Lyon, Donald Hedeker, Harriet de Wit

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Neural activation to monetary reward is associated with amphetamine reward sensitivity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica WeaferDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, MC3077, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. jweafer@uchicago.edu.
Nicholas LyonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, MC3077, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Donald HedekerDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, MC2000, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Harriet de WitDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, MC3077, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
University of Chicago · USChicago Department of Public Health · US

Funding

Determinants of Drug Preference in Humans--Administrative SupplementR01DA002812 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 1985 to 2024
$10.6M
Neurobiological factors underlying sex differences in risk for alcohol abuseK01AA024519 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI WEAFER, JESSICA J · 2016 to 2020
$598k
Inhibitory Control and Drug Reward in HumansR21DA037642 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 2015 to 2016
$433k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA024519NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002812NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA037642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivePreference for sweet taste rewards has been linked to the propensity for drug use in both animals and humans. Here, we tested the association between sweet taste liking and sensitivity to amphetamine reward in healthy adults. We hypothesized that sweet likers would report greater euphoria and stimulation following D-amphetamine (20 mg) compared to sweet dislikers.

methodsMen (n = 36) and women (n = 34) completed a sweet taste test in which they rated their liking of various concentrations of sucrose and filtered water (0.05, 0.10, 0.21, 0.42, and 0.83 M). Participants who preferred the highest concentration were classified as "sweet likers." All others were classified as "sweet dislikers." They then completed four sessions in which they received D-amphetamine (20 mg) and placebo in alternating order, providing self-report measures of euphoria and stimulation on the Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI) at regular intervals. We conducted linear mixed effects models to examine relationships between sweet liking and drug-induced euphoria and stimulation.

resultsSweet likers reported significantly greater amphetamine-induced euphoria than did sweet dislikers among women. By contrast, sweet liking was not associated with amphetamine response in men. No associations with stimulation were observed.

conclusionThe association between sweet preference and amphetamine response in women is consistent with animal studies linking sweet taste preference and drug reward and also fits with observations that individuals who use drugs show a preference for sweet tastes. Whether the sex difference is related to circulating hormones, or other variables, remains to be determined.

Indexed as

RewardAdultAmphetamine-Related DisordersAnimalsArousalBehavior, AddictiveDextroamphetamineEuphoriaFemaleFood PreferencesHumansIndividualityMaleMotivationSex FactorsStatistics as TopicDextroamphetamineSucroseAmphetamineDrug rewardSex differencesSubjective responseSweet taste

Identifiers

PMID28762072
PMCPMC5660927
OpenAlexW2740386335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.