Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28762012›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2017

Cross-cultural comparison of breast cancer patients' Quality of Life in the Netherlands and Japan.

M J Fischer, K Inoue, A Matsuda, J R Kroep, S Nagai, K Tozuka, M Momiyama, N I Weijl, D Langemeijer-Bosman, S R S Ramai and 6 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic review of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues associated with gastric cancer: capturing cross-cultural differences.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

M J FischerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, The Netherlands. m.j.fischer@lumc.nl.
K InoueDivision of Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
A MatsudaDepartment of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
J R KroepDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, The Netherlands.
S NagaiDivision of Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
K TozukaDivision of Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
M MomiyamaDivision of Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
N I WeijlDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands.
D Langemeijer-BosmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands.
S R S RamaiDepartment of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J W R NortierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, The Netherlands.
H PutterDepartment of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
K YamaokaGraduate School of Public Health, Teikyo University, Saitama, Japan.
K KubotaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, Nippon Medical School, Saitama, Japan.
K KobayashiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
A A KapteinUnit of Psychology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCultural differences are hypothesized to influence patients' Quality of Life (QoL) reports. However, there is a lack of empirical cross-cultural studies comparing QoL of patients with cancer. This study aims to compare QoL of women with breast cancer in the Netherlands and Japan, and to investigate the association of QoL with sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological variables (illness perceptions).

methodsDutch (n = 116) and Japanese (n = 148) women with early breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire immediately before their second cycle of chemotherapy.

resultsDutch women reported poorer Physical, Role, Emotional, and Cognitive functioning than Japanese women. Additionally, illness perceptions were significantly different in Japan and the Netherlands, but these did not vary across treatment type. In Japan, QoL of women receiving AC-chemotherapy was better than that of women receiving FEC-chemotherapy, whereas in the Netherlands, QoL did not vary as a function of chemotherapy. Illness perceptions about symptom severity, adverse consequences, and emotional representations were negatively related to most domains of patients' QoL in both countries. Adding illness perceptions as covariates to the ANOVA analyses rendered the effects of country and treatment type on QoL non-significant.

conclusionsComparing Dutch and Japanese women with early breast cancer revealed important differences in treatment modalities and illness perceptions which both appear to influence QoL. Perceptions about cancer have been found to vary across cultures, and our study suggests that these perceptions should be considered when performing cross-cultural studies focusing on patient-reported outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCross-Cultural ComparisonDrug TherapyFemaleHumansJapanMiddle AgedNetherlandsQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeBreast cancerBrief Illness Perception QuestionnaireChemotherapyCross-cultural comparisonEORTC QLQ-C30Illness perceptions

Identifiers

PMID28762012
PMCPMC5668344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.