ArticleJournal of advances in medical education & professionalism2017
Program evaluation of an Integrated Basic Science Medical Curriculum in Shiraz Medical School, Using CIPP Evaluation Model.
Article in Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- A satisfaction-focused CIPP evaluation of Mongolia's undergraduate occupational therapy program: a cross-sectional study.Korean journal of medical education · 2025Article
- Student Engagement in Medical Research Curriculum Development Strategies: A Comprehensive Approach Utilizing Mixed-Methods Study and SWOT-TOWS-AHP Analysis.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Using the CIPP Model to elicit perceptions of health professions faculty and students about virtual learning.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Traditional Persian Medicine curriculum and educational environment at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences: A CIPP model report.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a basic-clinical integrated pharmacology case-based learning program from a student perspective using the CIPP model.Korean journal of medical education · 2024Article
- A study of medical students' experiences at Shiraz University of medical sciences from the implementation of integration in medical education: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Navigating undergraduate medical education: a comparative evaluation of a fully online versus a hybrid model.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Beyond the surface: unraveling global health curriculum insights through interviews of learners and educators using the CIPP model.Korean journal of medical education · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- The blacksmith approach: a strategy for teaching and learning in the medical anatomy course (a qualitative study).BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Pathology of General Practice Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Students and Professors.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2021Article
- The effect of integration of basic and clinical aspects of a specific topic in a parasitology course on medical students learning: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of education and health promotion · 2021Article
- Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model in medical education: A systematic review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2021Review
- What Physicians Wished They Would Have Learned in Medical School: a Survey.Medical science educator · 2020Article
- How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2019Review
- Student Engagement in Program Evaluation: Redesigning the Premedical Curriculum Through Instructor-Learner Co-Creation.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- Introduction of temporal integration in fourth year MBBS curriculum; Students' experience.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn recent years curriculum reform and integration was done in many medical schools. The integrated curriculum is a popular concept all over the world. In Shiraz medical school, the reform was initiated by stablishing the horizontal basic science integration model and Early Clinical Exposure (ECE) for undergraduate medical education. The purpose of this study was to provide the required data for the program evaluation of this curriculum for undergraduate medical students, using CIPP program evaluation model.
methodsThis study is an analytic descriptive and triangulation mixed method study which was carried out in Shiraz Medical School in 2012, based on the views of professors of basic sciences courses and first and second year medical students. The study evaluated the quality of the relationship between basic sciences and clinical courses and the method of presenting such courses based on the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) model. The tools for collecting data, both quantitatively and qualitatively, were some questionnaires, content analysis of portfolios, semi- structured interview and brain storming sessions. For quantitative data analysis, SPSS software, version 14, was used.
resultsIn the context evaluation by modified DREEM questionnaire, 77.75%of the students believed that this educational system encourages them to actively participate in classes. Course schedule and atmosphere of class were reported suitable by 87.81% and 83.86% of students. In input domain that was measured by a researcher made questionnaire, the facilities for education were acceptable except for shortage of cadavers. In process evaluation, the quality of integrated modules presentation and Early Clinical Exposure (ECE) was good from the students' viewpoint. In product evaluation, students' brain storming, students' portfolio and semi-structured interview with faculties were done, showing some positive aspects of integration and some areas that need improvement.
conclusionThe main advantage of assessing an educational program based on CIPP evaluation model is that the context, input, process and product of the program are viewed and evaluated systematically. This will help the educational authorities to make proper decisions based on the weaknesses and strengths of the program on its continuation, cessation and revision. Based on the results of this study, the integrated basic sciences course for undergraduate medical students in Shiraz Medical School is at a desirable level. However, attempts to improve or reform some sections and continual evaluation of the program and its accreditation seem to be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28761888PMC5522906W2724683163What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.