Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28761747›Full record

ArticleESMO open2017

Eribulin for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treatment: a retrospective, multicenter study based in Campania, south Italy (Eri-001 trial).

Michele Orditura, Adriano Gravina, Ferdinando Riccardi, Anna Diana, Carmela Mocerino, Luigi Leopaldi, Alessio Fabozzi, Guido Giordano, Raffaele Nettuno, Pasquale Incoronato and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Michele OrdituraDipartimento di Internistica Clinica e Sperimentale Flaviano Magrassi, Università degli Studi della Campania"Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Adriano GravinaDepartment of Breast Oncology, National Cancer Institute 'Fondazione Pascale', Naples, Italy.
Ferdinando RiccardiOncology Unit, Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Anna DianaDipartimento di Internistica Clinica e Sperimentale Flaviano Magrassi, Università degli Studi della Campania"Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Carmela MocerinoOncology Unit, Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Luigi LeopaldiU.O. Oncologia Medica ASL NA1, Ospedale San Gennaro, Naples, Italy.
Alessio FabozziU.O. Oncologia Ospedale Sacro Cuore di Gesú, Fatebenefratelli, Benevento, Italy.
Guido GiordanoU.O. Oncologia Ospedale Sacro Cuore di Gesú, Fatebenefratelli, Benevento, Italy.
Raffaele NettunoU.O.S. di Oncologia ASL Caserta-PO AGP, di Piedimonte Matese (CE), Italy.
Pasquale IncoronatoServizio di Oncologia San Giuliano ASL NA2 NORD, Giugliano (NA), Italy.
Maria Luisa BarzelloniU.O. Oncologia AORN San Giuseppe Moscati, Avellino, Italy.
Roberta CaputoDepartment of Breast Oncology, National Cancer Institute 'Fondazione Pascale', Naples, Italy.
Agata PisanoU.O.C. Oncoematologia Ospedale Santa Maria Delle Grazie, Pozzuoli (NA), Italy.
Giuseppe GrimaldiU.O. Medicina-Oncoematologia Ospedale Umberto I, Nocera Inferiore (SA), Italy.
Geppino GenuaU.O. Oncologia Ospedale Civile ASL AV/1, Ariano Irpino (AV), Italy.
Vincenzo MontesarchioU.O.C. Oncologia AORN dei Colli, Ospedale 'V Monaldi', Naples, Italy.
Enrico BarbatoU.O.S.D. Oncologia Medica Ospedale 'Moscati', Aversa (CE), Italy.
Giovanni IodiceDepartment of Breast Oncology, National Cancer Institute 'Fondazione Pascale', Naples, Italy.
Eva LietoIX Divisione di Chirurgia Generale Dipartimento di Scienze Cardiotoraciche e Respiratorie Seconda, Università degli Studi di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Eugenio ProcacciniBreast Unit Second University of Naples School of Medicine, Naples, Italy.
Roberto MabiliaU.O. Oncologia Ospedale Anna Rizzoli, Ischia (NA), Italy.
Antonio FebbraroU.O. Oncologia Ospedale Sacro Cuore di Gesú, Fatebenefratelli, Benevento, Italy.
Michelino De LaurentiisDepartment of Breast Oncology, National Cancer Institute 'Fondazione Pascale', Naples, Italy.
Fortunato CiardielloDipartimento di Internistica Clinica e Sperimentale Flaviano Magrassi, Università degli Studi della Campania"Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco · ITAzienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati · ITFatebenefratelli Hospital · ITOspedale Monaldi · ITOspedale Santa Maria · ITOspedale Sant'Anna · ITOspedale S.Gennaro · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOn the basis of the results of two pivotal phase III clinical trials, eribulin mesylate is currently approved in EU for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (aBC) in patients who have previously received an anthracycline and a taxane in either the adjuvant or the metastatic setting, and at least one chemotherapeutic regimen for metastatic disease.

methodsIn our study, we investigated the efficacy and tolerability of eribulin as second or further line chemotherapy in 137 women affected by aBC.

resultsEribulin as monotherapy provided benefit in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) independently of its use as second or late-line therapy. The overall RR and DCR were 17.5% and 64%, respectively. In particular, DCR and overall RR were 50% and 13.6%, 65.4% and 21.1%, 70.4% and 14.8% and 66.7% and 16.7% in second, third, fourth and further lines of treatment, respectively. Median PFS (mPFS) according to the line of therapy was 5.7, 6.3, 4.5 and 4.0 months in patients treated with eribulin in second, third, fourth and over the fourth line, respectively. No significant difference in terms of mPFS was found between the various BC subtypes. Overall, eribulin resulted safe and most adverse events were of grade 1 or 2 and easily manageable. Grades 3-4 toxicities were neutropaenia and neurotoxicity.

conclusionsWith the limitations due to the observational nature of our findings, eribulin was shown to be an effective and safe therapeutic option in heavily pretreated patients with aBC.

Indexed as

advanced breast cancerchemotherapyeribulinreal-world population

Identifiers

PMID28761747
PMCPMC5519815
OpenAlexW2730295621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.