Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28761672›Full record

ArticleOpen heart

Adjunctive interpulmonary isthmus ablation has no added effects on atrial fibrillation recurrence.

Shunichi Higashiya, Hirosuke Yamaji, Takashi Murakami, Kazuyoshi Hina, Hiroshi Kawamura, Masaaki Murakami, Shigeshi Kamikawa, Issei Komatsubara, Shozo Kusachi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of ablation index settings on pulmonary vein reconnection.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shunichi HigashiyaHeart Rhythm Center, Okayama Heart Clinic, Okayama, Japan.
Hirosuke YamajiHeart Rhythm Center, Okayama Heart Clinic, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7758-154X
Takashi MurakamiHeart Rhythm Center, Okayama Heart Clinic, Okayama, Japan.
Kazuyoshi HinaHeart Rhythm Center, Okayama Heart Clinic, Okayama, Japan.
Hiroshi KawamuraHeart Rhythm Center, Okayama Heart Clinic, Okayama, Japan.
Masaaki MurakamiHeart Rhythm Center, Okayama Heart Clinic, Okayama, Japan.
Shigeshi KamikawaHeart Rhythm Center, Okayama Heart Clinic, Okayama, Japan.
Issei KomatsubaraDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Hospital, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Shozo KusachiHeart Rhythm Center, Okayama Heart Clinic, Okayama, Japan.
Heart Rhythm Society · USKawasaki Medical School · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveData on the efficacy of adjunctive interpulmonary isthmus ablation following completion of extensive encircling pulmonary vein isolation (EEPVI) on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence have still been insufficient. We aimed to compare the AF recurrence between EEPVI with and without adjunctive interpulmonary isthmus ablation.

methodsWe enrolled 200 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF (first session) who underwent EEPVI with double-Lasso technique. Patients were prospectively randomised into two groups: EEPVI with (group 1) and without (group 2) adjunctive interpulmonary isthmus ablation.

resultsNo differences were found in patients' clinical and echocardiographic backgrounds, including arrhythmia status, between the two groups. No differences were also observed in complications (two groin haematoma in both groups). All patients in both groups reached the EEPVI endpoint. The AF recurrence rate between groups 1 (32/100, 32%) and 2 (33/100, 33%; p=1.0) was quite similar during the follow-up period (45±5 months; 36-54 months). The two groups showed identical Kaplan-Meier AF-free curves (p=0.460; NS). Similar pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection incidence was observed in both groups during the second session. Durable isolation between the superior and inferior PVs was confirmed in 88% (21/27) of patients in group 1, indicating that interpulmonary isthmus ablation maintained a non-conducting state in a considerable number of patients. Nevertheless, AF recurrence was identical between the two groups.

conclusionThe results of our study showed similar AF recurrence rates between the two groups, indicating that adjunctive interpulmonary isthmus ablation with EEPVI has no obvious effects on AF recurrence.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationEndocardial mapRadiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID28761672
PMCPMC5515125
OpenAlexW2599658437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.