Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28761645›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2017

Is glycemia control in Canadians with diabetes individualized? A cross-sectional observational study.

Michael J Coons, Michelle Greiver, Babak Aliarzadeh, Christopher Meaney, Rahim Moineddin, Tyler Williamson, John Queenan, Catherine H Yu, David G White, Tara Kiran and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03689049 (SPIDER), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03689049 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

SPIDER: A Structured Process Informed by Data, Evidence and Research - A Research and Quality Improvement Collaboration Supporting Practices in Improving Care for Complex Elderly Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Toronto Practice Based Research NetworkRan2018 to 2027Enrolled104ConditionsPolypharmacy, Inappropriate Prescribing, Aged, Primary Health CareArmsSPIDER, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Trends in HbAPharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michael J CoonsDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Michelle GreiverDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Babak AliarzadehDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Christopher MeaneyDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Rahim MoineddinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Tyler WilliamsonCanadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network, Kingston, Canada.
John QueenanCanadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network, Kingston, Canada.
Catherine H YuDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
David G WhiteDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Tara KiranDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Jennifer J KaneDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDiabetes guidelines recommend individualized glycemic targets: tighter control in younger, healthier patients and consideration of more moderate control in the elderly and those with coexisting illnesses. Our objective was to examine whether glycemic control varied by age and comorbidities in Canadian primary care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsCross-sectional study using data from the electronic medical records of 537 primary care providers across Canada; 30 416 patients with diabetes, aged 40 or above, with at least one encounter and one hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurement between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2013. The outcome was the most recent HbA1c, categorized into three levels of control: tight (<7.0% or <53 mmol/mol), moderate (7.0%-8.5%, 53 mmol/mol-69.5 mmol/mol) and uncontrolled (>8.5% or >69.5 mmol/mol). We adjusted for several factors associated with glycemic control including treatment intensity.

resultsYounger patients (aged 40-49) were more likely to have moderate as opposed to tight control than the older patients (aged 80+) (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.49, p=0.001). The youngest were also more likely to have uncontrolled as opposed to moderately controlled glycemia (OR 3.39; 95% CI 2.75 to 4.17, p<0.0001). Patients with no or only one comorbidity were more likely to have moderate as opposed to tight control than those with three or more comorbidities (OR 1.66;95% CI 1.46 to 1.90, p<0.0001).

conclusionsLevels of glycemic control, given age and comorbidities appear to differ from guideline recommendations. Research is needed to understand these discrepancies and develop methods to assist providers in personalizing glycemic targets.

Indexed as

AgedCross-Sectional studiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapyHemoglobin A.GlycosylatedPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID28761645
PMCPMC5530242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.