Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28761387›Full record

ArticlePragmatic and observational research2017

Abortion, an increasing public health concern in Ecuador, a 10-year population-based analysis.

Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Katherine Simbaña, Lenin Gómez, Anna M Stewart-Ibarra, Lisa Scott, Gabriel Cevallos-Sierra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pragmatic and observational research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Esteban Ortiz-PradoOneHealth Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad De Las Americas, Quito, Ecuador.
Katherine SimbañaCenter for Global Health and Translational Science, Upstate Medical University, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Lenin GómezCenter for Global Health and Translational Science, Upstate Medical University, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Anna M Stewart-IbarraDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine.
Lisa ScottGraduate College of Biomedical Sciences, Western University of Health Sciences, Lebanon, OR, USA.
Gabriel Cevallos-SierraSchool of Public Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the epidemiology of abortion in Ecuador from 2004 to 2014 and compare the prevalence between the public and the private health care systems.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional analysis of the overall mortality and morbidity rate due to abortion in Ecuador, based on public health records and other government databases.

resultsFrom 2004 to 2014, a total of 431,614 spontaneous abortions, miscarriage and other types of abortions were registered in Ecuador. The average annual rate of abortion was 115 per 1,000 live births. The maternal mortality rate was found to be 43 per 100,000 live births.

conclusionsAbortion is a significant and wide-ranging problem in Ecuador. The study supports the perception that in spite of legal restrictions to abortion in Ecuador, women are still terminating pregnancies when they feel they need to do so. The public health system reported >84% of the national overall prevalence.

Indexed as

clandestine abortionmetrotexatemisoprostolprivate vs public health systemtherapeutic abortion

Identifiers

PMID28761387
PMCPMC5516879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.