ReviewClinical and experimental gastroenterology2017
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: patient selection and special considerations.
Review in Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04593407 (Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Laterally Spreading Lesions Non Granular-Flat Elevated Type), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Laterally Spreading Lesions Non Granular-Flat Elevated Type (LSL-NG-FE) ≥ 20 mm and LSLs-Granular Mixed Type ≥ 30 mm. A Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Surgical resection after endoscopic resection in patients with T1 colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- The current state of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the UK: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Feasibility and performance evaluation of a robotic steerable endoscopic submucosal dissection knife (with video).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection: Challenges, innovations, and the road ahead.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Review
- Novel non-curable resection prediction model for early colorectal cancer following endoscopic submucosal dissection based on inflammatory immune index.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A Nationwide Survey of Training Pathways and Practice Trends of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Canada.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- High burden of polyp mischaracterisation in tertiary centre referrals for endoscopic resection may be alleviated by telestration.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Patient outcomes after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer: a single-center, retrospective cohort study.Translational cancer research · 2021Article
- Learning endoscopic submucosal dissection in the UK: Barriers, solutions and pathways for training.Frontline gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Outcomes of endoscopic resection of large colorectal lesions subjected to prior failed resection or substantial manipulation.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Article
- Endoscopic resection of colorectal circumferential and near-circumferential laterally spreading lesions: outcomes and risk of stenosis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection of large complex colorectal superficial neoplastic lesions, resulting in very low rates of local recurrence, high-quality pathologic specimens for accurate histopathologic diagnosis and potentially curative treatment of early adenocarcinoma without resorting to major surgical resection. The safety and efficacy of the technique, which was pioneered in the upper gastrointestinal tract, has been established by the consistently impressive outcomes from expert centers in Japan and some other eastern countries. However, ESD is challenging to perform in the colorectum and there is a significant risk of complications, particularly in the early stages of the learning curve. Early studies from western centers raised concerns about the high complication rates, and the impressive results from Japanese centers were not replicated. As a result, many western endoscopists are skeptical about the role of ESD and few centers have incorporated the technique into their practice. Nevertheless, although the distribution of expertise, referral centers and modes of practice may differ in Japan and western countries, ESD has an important role and can be safely and effectively incorporated into western practice. Key to achieving this is meticulous lesion assessment and selection, appropriate referral to centers with the necessary expertise and experience and application of the appropriate technique individualized to the patient. This review discusses the advantages, risks and benefits of ESD to treat colorectal lesions and the importance of preprocedure lesion assessment and in vivo diagnosis and outlines a pragmatic rationale for appropriate lesion selection as well as the patient, technical and institutional factors that should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.