Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28761323›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2017

The comparative safety of genipin versus UVA-riboflavin crosslinking of rabbit corneas.

Wenjing Song, Yun Tang, Jing Qiao, Haili Li, Bei Rong, Songlin Yang, Yuan Wu, Xiaoming Yan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Genipin in an Ex Vivo Corneal Model of Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis.Translational vision science & technology · 2021
    Article
  6. Genipin Delays Corneal Stromal Enzymatic Digestion.Translational vision science & technology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sustained scleral stiffening in rats after a single genipin treatment.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wenjing SongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Vision Loss and Restoration, Ministry of Education, Beijing China.
Yun TangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Vision Loss and Restoration, Ministry of Education, Beijing China.
Jing QiaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Vision Loss and Restoration, Ministry of Education, Beijing China.
Haili LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Vision Loss and Restoration, Ministry of Education, Beijing China.
Bei RongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Vision Loss and Restoration, Ministry of Education, Beijing China.
Songlin YangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Vision Loss and Restoration, Ministry of Education, Beijing China.
Yuan WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Vision Loss and Restoration, Ministry of Education, Beijing China.
Xiaoming YanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Vision Loss and Restoration, Ministry of Education, Beijing China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate, after 24 h, the safety of genipin or ultraviolet A (UVA)-riboflavin crosslinking of keratocytes and endothelial cells.

methodsFifteen New Zealand white rabbits were selected and divided into a PBS group (five rabbits), a 0.2% genipin crosslinking (GP-CXL) group (five rabbits), and a UVA-riboflavin crosslinking (UVA-CXL) group (five rabbits). In the GP-CXL and PBS groups, 0.2% genipin or PBS was applied to the corneal surface of the right eyes. In the UVA-CXL group, a clinical crosslinking procedure was used. Before and after surgery, the operated eyes of each group were characterized with confocal microscopy, and the corneal buttons were excised for endothelium staining and electron microscopy.

resultsThe corneal endothelial cell density of the GP-CXL, UVA-CLX, and PBS groups changed. There was a statistically significant difference in thickness and changes in corneal endothelial cell density between the UVA-CXL group and the PBS group (p<0.05), and between the UVA-CXL group and the GP-CXL group (p<0.05), but no statistically significant difference between the GP-CXL group and the PBS group. Confocal microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and hematoxylin and eosin staining showed that there was keratocyte apoptosis in the anterior and middle stroma and endothelial cell damage in the UVA-CXL group. In the GP-CXL group, only active keratocytes were found and minimal endothelial cell damage.

conclusionsTreatment of rabbit corneas with 0.2% genipin showed minimal toxicity toward keratocytes and endothelial cells. Genipin is safer than UVA-CXL for crosslinking of thin corneas.

Indexed as

Cross-Linking ReagentsAnimalsCell CountCholagogues and CholereticsCollagenCorneal KeratocytesCorneal StromaEndothelium, CornealFemaleIridoidsMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsRabbitsRiboflavinCholagogues and CholereticsCollagenCross-Linking ReagentsgenipinIridoidsPhotosensitizing AgentsRiboflavin

Identifiers

PMID28761323
PMCPMC5524432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.